<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Clinton is asked for Firefox in the US Department of State</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:50:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alexandrojv</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-75326</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandrojv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-75326</guid>
		<description>what are you talking about, Chrome is much safer that FF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are you talking about, Chrome is much safer that FF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mj</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-75317</link>
		<dc:creator>mj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-75317</guid>
		<description>Chrome, corporate? So we get PCs hijacked everytime that Chrome has a remote execution exploit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome, corporate? So we get PCs hijacked everytime that Chrome has a remote execution exploit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexandrojv</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-74499</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandrojv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-74499</guid>
		<description>They should just use Google Chrome instead of Firefox, that way they will get things done way faster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should just use Google Chrome instead of Firefox, that way they will get things done way faster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72208</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72208</guid>
		<description>Probably harmless but this is another (barely known) company which produces the msi. They are probably safe, but they could contain a virus or spyware.
On the other hand the configuration isn&#039;t easy either. IE can be fully managed using GPO in Active Directory, so the start page, cache settings, ... can be tweaked. Firefox can be tweaked through their configuration files, but this is harder to do for an entire network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably harmless but this is another (barely known) company which produces the msi. They are probably safe, but they could contain a virus or spyware.<br />
On the other hand the configuration isn&#8217;t easy either. IE can be fully managed using GPO in Active Directory, so the start page, cache settings, &#8230; can be tweaked. Firefox can be tweaked through their configuration files, but this is harder to do for an entire network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cj</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72204</link>
		<dc:creator>cj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72204</guid>
		<description>msi have the advantage that every program can be installed with the same parameters: /qn is the silent install, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>msi have the advantage that every program can be installed with the same parameters: /qn is the silent install, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Xavier</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72177</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Xavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72177</guid>
		<description>the DoD does NOT run FireFox. The Army or Navy MAY have organizations that run firefox, but the Air Force, does NOT. The Air Force standard desktop absolutely does not allow for mozilla software. Infact, mozilla.org, is BLOCKED for the Air Force on INOSC East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the DoD does NOT run FireFox. The Army or Navy MAY have organizations that run firefox, but the Air Force, does NOT. The Air Force standard desktop absolutely does not allow for mozilla software. Infact, mozilla.org, is BLOCKED for the Air Force on INOSC East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosÃ©</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72175</link>
		<dc:creator>JosÃ©</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72175</guid>
		<description>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231062#c126</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231062#c126" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231062#c126</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maus</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72174</link>
		<dc:creator>Maus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72174</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain why .msi ist important for &quot;corporate deployments&quot; and the .exe installer is not enough?


Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain why .msi ist important for &#8220;corporate deployments&#8221; and the .exe installer is not enough?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Rodriguez</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72173</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Rodriguez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72173</guid>
		<description>US Department of State certainly have enough money to hire a developer to contribute the required MSI installer...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Department of State certainly have enough money to hire a developer to contribute the required MSI installer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72149</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72149</guid>
		<description>Vote for it!
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/votes.cgi?action=show_user&amp;bug_id=231062#vote_231062

Why they just can&#039;t reply the job done at
http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/download_firefox.htm
?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for it!<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/votes.cgi?action=show_user&amp;bug_id=231062#vote_231062" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/votes.cgi?action=show_user&amp;bug_id=231062#vote_231062</a></p>
<p>Why they just can&#8217;t reply the job done at<br />
<a href="http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/download_firefox.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/download_firefox.htm</a><br />
?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex G</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72148</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72148</guid>
		<description>No Firefox MSI? What&#039;s this? http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Firefox MSI? What&#8217;s this? <a href="http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontmotion.com/Firefox/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72130</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72130</guid>
		<description>Nothing is ever deleted from bugzilla. It is bug 231062</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is ever deleted from bugzilla. It is bug 231062</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omega X</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72129</link>
		<dc:creator>Omega X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72129</guid>
		<description>I believe this was around 2005-06 when I read that, a basic bugzilla search can produce results if its still in the system.  It was a while ago.

Later Eric Kuo @ frontmotion.com in 2007 volunteered to do the work. But for a long time couldn&#039;t get in touch with anyone from Mozilla until Robert S. the maintainer of the NSIS stuff gave him a couple of pointers of which a comment that he wasn&#039;t doing MSI work &quot;anytime soon&quot;. A patch was contributed and rejected. I guess after a while Eric found it better to continue to maintain his own stuff instead. He still does matter of fact. I never really asked why he stopped all of a sudden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this was around 2005-06 when I read that, a basic bugzilla search can produce results if its still in the system.  It was a while ago.</p>
<p>Later Eric Kuo @ frontmotion.com in 2007 volunteered to do the work. But for a long time couldn&#8217;t get in touch with anyone from Mozilla until Robert S. the maintainer of the NSIS stuff gave him a couple of pointers of which a comment that he wasn&#8217;t doing MSI work &#8220;anytime soon&#8221;. A patch was contributed and rejected. I guess after a while Eric found it better to continue to maintain his own stuff instead. He still does matter of fact. I never really asked why he stopped all of a sudden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72125</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72125</guid>
		<description>DoD runs Firefox and were a world wide organization. We even run it in classified environments.  Seems like our lock downs and patch management could easily be adopted by State</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DoD runs Firefox and were a world wide organization. We even run it in classified environments.  Seems like our lock downs and patch management could easily be adopted by State</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72124</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72124</guid>
		<description>Citation please.  This sounds a lot like a rumor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citation please.  This sounds a lot like a rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72123</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72123</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an open source project.  If you&#039;re so interested and it&#039;s so easy, why haven&#039;t _you_ stepped in to make it happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an open source project.  If you&#8217;re so interested and it&#8217;s so easy, why haven&#8217;t _you_ stepped in to make it happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omega X</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72108</link>
		<dc:creator>Omega X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72108</guid>
		<description>Actually, there was a contributor willing to do MSI packaging, but it was rejected. The message was along the lines of &quot;we do not want enterprise deployment at this time&quot;. The decision was to focus on the end user for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there was a contributor willing to do MSI packaging, but it was rejected. The message was along the lines of &#8220;we do not want enterprise deployment at this time&#8221;. The decision was to focus on the end user for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RenÃ© L.</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/07/hilary-clinton-is-asked-for-firefox-in-the-us-department-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-72106</link>
		<dc:creator>RenÃ© L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3584#comment-72106</guid>
		<description>I am hoping for several years now that Mozilla takes corporate deployments more seriously.

There are still many discussions going on but it seems that nobody takes a lead and prioritizes it:
http://osdir.com/ml/dev-apps-firefox/2009-06/msg00088.html

I can&#039;t find any occurrences of &quot;business&quot;, &quot;enterprise&quot;, &quot;corporate&quot;, &quot;deployment&quot; or &quot;MSI&quot; in
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Namoroka

After all, what is so hard about that?
Opera has MSI installers for a long time now.

And what about school / LTSP deployments?
http://laserjock.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/why-we-need-edubuntu-to-succeed/

There should be
https://edge.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts
for Mozilla, too, I am sure that MSI would be a highly suggested feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hoping for several years now that Mozilla takes corporate deployments more seriously.</p>
<p>There are still many discussions going on but it seems that nobody takes a lead and prioritizes it:<br />
<a href="http://osdir.com/ml/dev-apps-firefox/2009-06/msg00088.html" rel="nofollow">http://osdir.com/ml/dev-apps-firefox/2009-06/msg00088.html</a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find any occurrences of &#8220;business&#8221;, &#8220;enterprise&#8221;, &#8220;corporate&#8221;, &#8220;deployment&#8221; or &#8220;MSI&#8221; in<br />
<a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Namoroka" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Namoroka</a></p>
<p>After all, what is so hard about that?<br />
Opera has MSI installers for a long time now.</p>
<p>And what about school / LTSP deployments?<br />
<a href="http://laserjock.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/why-we-need-edubuntu-to-succeed/" rel="nofollow">http://laserjock.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/why-we-need-edubuntu-to-succeed/</a></p>
<p>There should be<br />
<a href="https://edge.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts" rel="nofollow">https://edge.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts</a><br />
for Mozilla, too, I am sure that MSI would be a highly suggested feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
