<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Firefox will be multiprocess</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:50:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jared Haer</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-77057</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Haer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-77057</guid>
		<description>Firefox could stand to improve it&#039;s use of multiple processors. I have often noticed when Firefox is sluggish one core is maxed out at 100% utilization, while the other one is at almost 0%.  I will follow this project closely as I am very excited about what it may offer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox could stand to improve it&#8217;s use of multiple processors. I have often noticed when Firefox is sluggish one core is maxed out at 100% utilization, while the other one is at almost 0%.  I will follow this project closely as I am very excited about what it may offer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hall</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-75208</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-75208</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to have the best of both worlds?  Continue single-process Firefox tabs, plus an option to create a new tab as a new process: basically as a new window, which looks like a tab, but perhaps in a different colour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to have the best of both worlds?  Continue single-process Firefox tabs, plus an option to create a new tab as a new process: basically as a new window, which looks like a tab, but perhaps in a different colour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: First results of Electrolysis, multi-process Firefox - Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-71668</link>
		<dc:creator>First results of Electrolysis, multi-process Firefox - Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-71668</guid>
		<description>[...] A few weeks ago, Mozilla announced Electrolysis, a new project that aims to make Firefox a multi-process application, with separate processes for the user interface (chrome), each tab, and plugins, in order to provide higher stability as a a problem with a plugin or a certain web page wouldn&#8217;t bring down the whole session; higher performace, as today&#8217;s multi-core processors can handle multiple tasks at a time; and stronger security, as each could run on different security contexts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks ago, Mozilla announced Electrolysis, a new project that aims to make Firefox a multi-process application, with separate processes for the user interface (chrome), each tab, and plugins, in order to provide higher stability as a a problem with a plugin or a certain web page wouldn&#8217;t bring down the whole session; higher performace, as today&#8217;s multi-core processors can handle multiple tasks at a time; and stronger security, as each could run on different security contexts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: venkat</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70691</link>
		<dc:creator>venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 12:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70691</guid>
		<description>single tab process always useful as Firefox is getting crashed common now a days ,if firefox crashed with this feature wonly one tab will be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>single tab process always useful as Firefox is getting crashed common now a days ,if firefox crashed with this feature wonly one tab will be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amar</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70564</link>
		<dc:creator>Amar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70564</guid>
		<description>If the goals of this project is to provide better responsiveness and improve robustness as a result - I think there can be another way than to use multiple processes. There is a screen cast on  how we ensure responsiveness in Firefox by separating each JS application with an isolation called Script Space.

http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/anim/mutidiv.htm

This is the example code that was run. 
http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/test_set/multidiv.html

A click on the button would cause the browser to run a busy JavaScript loop .Firefox will not be able to process any more event unless the loop completes. 

We believe that JavaScript executions can be isolated if they belong to different events &amp; different Script Space( this is a grouping of events based on DOM hierarchy)  each event running in a separate thread. Threads then can be scheduled to ensure fairness in execution. By separating the execution of the onclick handlers , we can click on the second button while the other one is running its onclick handler - Thus ensuring responsiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the goals of this project is to provide better responsiveness and improve robustness as a result &#8211; I think there can be another way than to use multiple processes. There is a screen cast on  how we ensure responsiveness in Firefox by separating each JS application with an isolation called Script Space.</p>
<p><a href="http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/anim/mutidiv.htm" rel="nofollow">http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/anim/mutidiv.htm</a></p>
<p>This is the example code that was run.<br />
<a href="http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/test_set/multidiv.html" rel="nofollow">http://people.cs.vt.edu/~adeka/jstests/test_set/multidiv.html</a></p>
<p>A click on the button would cause the browser to run a busy JavaScript loop .Firefox will not be able to process any more event unless the loop completes. </p>
<p>We believe that JavaScript executions can be isolated if they belong to different events &amp; different Script Space( this is a grouping of events based on DOM hierarchy)  each event running in a separate thread. Threads then can be scheduled to ensure fairness in execution. By separating the execution of the onclick handlers , we can click on the second button while the other one is running its onclick handler &#8211; Thus ensuring responsiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70551</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70551</guid>
		<description>Finally!
Better late then never, this is one of the things that have been long overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!<br />
Better late then never, this is one of the things that have been long overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lewis</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70544</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70544</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy if it just ran in Linux as fast as it does in Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy if it just ran in Linux as fast as it does in Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70543</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70543</guid>
		<description>Thanks Alex. That was a mistake I&#039;ve just been able to correct. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alex. That was a mistake I&#8217;ve just been able to correct. Sorry for any confusion this may have caused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: True Falcon</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70539</link>
		<dc:creator>True Falcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 20:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70539</guid>
		<description>Re the pdf files - go to options/applications.  enter pdf in the search box.  change the action to &#039;use Foxit Reader&#039;.  Now the pdfs will automatically download in the browser downloader and open outside in the reader.  Problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the pdf files &#8211; go to options/applications.  enter pdf in the search box.  change the action to &#8216;use Foxit Reader&#8217;.  Now the pdfs will automatically download in the browser downloader and open outside in the reader.  Problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70533</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70533</guid>
		<description>Speed and security is the real advantage of having a multi-process web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed and security is the real advantage of having a multi-process web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck in Dallas</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70532</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck in Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70532</guid>
		<description>Firefox is starting to fall behind. I&#039;ll stick to it because of the great plugins but my original interest in FF was because it was cutting edge and fast.

Now it seems like a technology laggard and bloated. I hope they get their act together before Chrome or Safari comes from behind in innovation.  Never mid IE, I won;t go back to MS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is starting to fall behind. I&#8217;ll stick to it because of the great plugins but my original interest in FF was because it was cutting edge and fast.</p>
<p>Now it seems like a technology laggard and bloated. I hope they get their act together before Chrome or Safari comes from behind in innovation.  Never mid IE, I won;t go back to MS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leandro</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70521</link>
		<dc:creator>leandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 06:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70521</guid>
		<description>and about the new:tab ?? sorry if you blogged earlier, i cant remember...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and about the new:tab ?? sorry if you blogged earlier, i cant remember&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi-Process Support Coming to Firefox &#171; The Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70517</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi-Process Support Coming to Firefox &#171; The Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70517</guid>
		<description>[...] in the early phases and likely won&#8217;t be part of Firefox 3.5, but rather Firefox 3.6. From Mozilla Links: Mozilla has started a new project to make Firefox split in several processes at a time: one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the early phases and likely won&#8217;t be part of Firefox 3.5, but rather Firefox 3.6. From Mozilla Links: Mozilla has started a new project to make Firefox split in several processes at a time: one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Multi-Process Coming to Firefox &#171; The Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70514</link>
		<dc:creator>Multi-Process Coming to Firefox &#171; The Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 20:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70514</guid>
		<description>[...] in the early phases and likely won&#8217;t be part of Firefox 3.5, but rather Firefox 3.6. From Mozilla Links: Mozilla has started a new project to make Firefox split in several processes at a time: one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the early phases and likely won&#8217;t be part of Firefox 3.5, but rather Firefox 3.6. From Mozilla Links: Mozilla has started a new project to make Firefox split in several processes at a time: one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuShrike</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70505</link>
		<dc:creator>NuShrike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70505</guid>
		<description>This is all about moving the responsibility for managing disparate sessions to the layer/experts whom know it best, the OS.  It does reduce the ability to share memory and makes IPC more difficult, but that&#039;s great security-wise.

Basically, exactly what Apache and PostgreSQL has ben doing for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all about moving the responsibility for managing disparate sessions to the layer/experts whom know it best, the OS.  It does reduce the ability to share memory and makes IPC more difficult, but that&#8217;s great security-wise.</p>
<p>Basically, exactly what Apache and PostgreSQL has ben doing for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Werdmuller</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Werdmuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70492</guid>
		<description>In my opinion this is where Mozilla need to be looking to improve the browser. All the new evolutionary features they&#039;re looking into are fine, but ultimately a browser needs to be an almost-invisible, efficient way of getting to web content and applications. I&#039;ve found myself moving to Chrome for day-to-day tasks, and it&#039;s going to take massively-improved performance from a multi-process Firefox to get me to move back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion this is where Mozilla need to be looking to improve the browser. All the new evolutionary features they&#8217;re looking into are fine, but ultimately a browser needs to be an almost-invisible, efficient way of getting to web content and applications. I&#8217;ve found myself moving to Chrome for day-to-day tasks, and it&#8217;s going to take massively-improved performance from a multi-process Firefox to get me to move back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lennie</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70489</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70489</guid>
		<description>@Nils You most be using the windows default taskmanager which doesn&#039;t list parent/child relationships for processes. I think the problem here is the taskmanager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nils You most be using the windows default taskmanager which doesn&#8217;t list parent/child relationships for processes. I think the problem here is the taskmanager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70488</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70488</guid>
		<description>Alex is right here. Multiprocessing isn&#039;t going to be directly improved by splitting into more prosesses, but it could lead to those processes being more &quot;threaded&quot; than Firefox is now.
I&#039;m too a sloppy user with sessions of 50 tabs or so. They arent all flash and pdf, more like wikipedia and API-references. So is Firefox gonna start up 50 processes when I fire up one of those saved sessions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex is right here. Multiprocessing isn&#8217;t going to be directly improved by splitting into more prosesses, but it could lead to those processes being more &#8220;threaded&#8221; than Firefox is now.<br />
I&#8217;m too a sloppy user with sessions of 50 tabs or so. They arent all flash and pdf, more like wikipedia and API-references. So is Firefox gonna start up 50 processes when I fire up one of those saved sessions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neona</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70482</link>
		<dc:creator>Neona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70482</guid>
		<description>I would think so, but I don&#039;t think i&#039;ve /ever/ actually seen firefox tap more than one core, even when lagging under heavy load (loading 20+ tabs, for example).  I always thought that was weird, so for some reason it must be confined to one core even though it is multithreaded.  I hope this fixes that some, whatever the issue is.

The sandboxing is nice too, i dont like firefox freaking out because one page is somehow messing it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think so, but I don&#8217;t think i&#8217;ve /ever/ actually seen firefox tap more than one core, even when lagging under heavy load (loading 20+ tabs, for example).  I always thought that was weird, so for some reason it must be confined to one core even though it is multithreaded.  I hope this fixes that some, whatever the issue is.</p>
<p>The sandboxing is nice too, i dont like firefox freaking out because one page is somehow messing it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bishop</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70474</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70474</guid>
		<description>Careful with the terminology here: Firefox already has multiprocessor support because it uses multiple threads; this project is about moving from a single processes to multiple processes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful with the terminology here: Firefox already has multiprocessor support because it uses multiple threads; this project is about moving from a single processes to multiple processes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox seguirÃ¡ los pasos de Chrome y serÃ¡ multiproceso - Zona Firefox</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70467</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox seguirÃ¡ los pasos de Chrome y serÃ¡ multiproceso - Zona Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70467</guid>
		<description>[...] y para ello ha comenzado con un nuevo proyecto por ahora llamado Content Processes con la idea de que cada pestaÃ±a sea un proceso aparte y todos ellos sean controlados por un proceso central que controlarÃ­a la interfaz del [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] y para ello ha comenzado con un nuevo proyecto por ahora llamado Content Processes con la idea de que cada pestaÃ±a sea un proceso aparte y todos ellos sean controlados por un proceso central que controlarÃ­a la interfaz del [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daylight burns the eyes</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70458</link>
		<dc:creator>daylight burns the eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70458</guid>
		<description>@Nils
I was the same way until a few weeks ago, I also had the same mindset about this idea but instead I started using the bookmarking system in Firefox more effectively and have now trimmed my normal 107-140 tabs down to about five or six. If you organize it right it can work out very well. Folders are your parents, and separators are your friends. 

@Theory
You&#039;re right, but I think he&#039;s talking about the processes you see in your task manager, which for every tab you have open in the browser would show a new Firefox process.

Although that may bulk up your listing some you can still type out the first few letters of what you&#039;re looking for (just click anywhere on an active process then type eg: word) and it should take you to that process in a jump. It makes finding a specific process much faster when you&#039;re in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nils<br />
I was the same way until a few weeks ago, I also had the same mindset about this idea but instead I started using the bookmarking system in Firefox more effectively and have now trimmed my normal 107-140 tabs down to about five or six. If you organize it right it can work out very well. Folders are your parents, and separators are your friends. </p>
<p>@Theory<br />
You&#8217;re right, but I think he&#8217;s talking about the processes you see in your task manager, which for every tab you have open in the browser would show a new Firefox process.</p>
<p>Although that may bulk up your listing some you can still type out the first few letters of what you&#8217;re looking for (just click anywhere on an active process then type eg: word) and it should take you to that process in a jump. It makes finding a specific process much faster when you&#8217;re in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Sinha</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70456</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Sinha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70456</guid>
		<description>Flash also makes life a mess and in browsers like Firefox, one freeze takes down the browser.
I wish Firefox has this feature, since memory is quite cheap these days. Secondly, browser is an integral part of our Internet life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flash also makes life a mess and in browsers like Firefox, one freeze takes down the browser.<br />
I wish Firefox has this feature, since memory is quite cheap these days. Secondly, browser is an integral part of our Internet life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickF</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70444</link>
		<dc:creator>NickF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70444</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called multi-process not multiprocessor... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called multi-process not multiprocessor&#8230; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaruiKoohii</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2009/05/future-firefox-will-be-multiprocess/comment-page-1/#comment-70440</link>
		<dc:creator>WaruiKoohii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3169#comment-70440</guid>
		<description>The sandboxing in Chrome, IE7, and IE8 is unrelated to running each tab in separate processes.  This specific project is unrelated to sandboxing.

Chrome, IE7, and IE8 all run their processes below the user privilege, so if malware compromises the browser, it can&#039;t actually do anything.

Firefox currently, and even after this, will run at user privileged level, so if the browser is compromised, so is the user account.

That said, Mozilla is supposed to be implementing sandboxing in 4.0.  We&#039;ll see if that goes anywhere or not.  I hope it does, it&#039;s a basic security measure that Mozilla has ignored for far too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sandboxing in Chrome, IE7, and IE8 is unrelated to running each tab in separate processes.  This specific project is unrelated to sandboxing.</p>
<p>Chrome, IE7, and IE8 all run their processes below the user privilege, so if malware compromises the browser, it can&#8217;t actually do anything.</p>
<p>Firefox currently, and even after this, will run at user privileged level, so if the browser is compromised, so is the user account.</p>
<p>That said, Mozilla is supposed to be implementing sandboxing in 4.0.  We&#8217;ll see if that goes anywhere or not.  I hope it does, it&#8217;s a basic security measure that Mozilla has ignored for far too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
