<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camino 2.0 Alpha 1 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/10/camino-20-alpha-1-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/10/camino-20-alpha-1-released/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:33:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin XY</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/10/camino-20-alpha-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-67043</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin XY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=2579#comment-67043</guid>
		<description>Oh, I see... I didn&#039;t know that Gecko 1.9.1 have some major changes... But as I can remember, Mozilla drops the support for previous engine versions after only 6 month. Because Firefox 3.1 (Gecko 1.9.1) should be released sometimes in the first quarter 2009, the Gecko 1.9.0 Branch will be closed sometimes in summer. I don&#039;t know how the roadmap for Camino 2.0 is look like, but since there is just the first alpha version, I imagine that the development will take some time. Can&#039;t it be that there isn&#039;t enough &quot;supporting time&quot; for the 1.9.0 branch?
I&#039;m just interested in that stuff... Thanks for all the explanations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I see&#8230; I didn&#8217;t know that Gecko 1.9.1 have some major changes&#8230; But as I can remember, Mozilla drops the support for previous engine versions after only 6 month. Because Firefox 3.1 (Gecko 1.9.1) should be released sometimes in the first quarter 2009, the Gecko 1.9.0 Branch will be closed sometimes in summer. I don&#8217;t know how the roadmap for Camino 2.0 is look like, but since there is just the first alpha version, I imagine that the development will take some time. Can&#8217;t it be that there isn&#8217;t enough &#8220;supporting time&#8221; for the 1.9.0 branch?<br />
I&#8217;m just interested in that stuff&#8230; Thanks for all the explanations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Morgan</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/10/camino-20-alpha-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-67036</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=2579#comment-67036</guid>
		<description>Using Gecko 1.9.1 would require rewriting several significant portions of Camino, because some older components that we still need and were originally going to be left in place until Mozilla 2 were instead removed in Gecko 1.9.1. That means we&#039;d have to do work we didn&#039;t anticipate being necessary for many months, if not longer, is suddenly an immediate requirement of using Gecko 1.9.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Gecko 1.9.1 would require rewriting several significant portions of Camino, because some older components that we still need and were originally going to be left in place until Mozilla 2 were instead removed in Gecko 1.9.1. That means we&#8217;d have to do work we didn&#8217;t anticipate being necessary for many months, if not longer, is suddenly an immediate requirement of using Gecko 1.9.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin XY</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/10/camino-20-alpha-1-released/comment-page-1/#comment-67022</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin XY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=2579#comment-67022</guid>
		<description>Why do they not use the Gecko 1.9.1 Engine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they not use the Gecko 1.9.1 Engine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
