<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Firefox is 100% organic software?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. McNair</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60288</link>
		<dc:creator>J. McNair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/#comment-60288</guid>
		<description>Agreed. &quot;Organic&quot; can apply to any successful open source product, allowing that a community of constituents (users and developers) determines the output, similar to how organs work in a human body.

Of course, organic could apply to successful corporations, but it wouldn&#039;t apply as well to their products. Calling Windows or Oracle &quot;organic&quot; works about as well as calling a Ford truck organic. Closed source software development is not easily brandable, nor is it always bad for you. Finally, like processed food, it is necessarily everywhere.

Still, Roman March noted that &quot;organic&quot; is losing its lustre from overuse, so maybe Mozilla&#039;s clever marketing is a little late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. &#8220;Organic&#8221; can apply to any successful open source product, allowing that a community of constituents (users and developers) determines the output, similar to how organs work in a human body.</p>
<p>Of course, organic could apply to successful corporations, but it wouldn&#8217;t apply as well to their products. Calling Windows or Oracle &#8220;organic&#8221; works about as well as calling a Ford truck organic. Closed source software development is not easily brandable, nor is it always bad for you. Finally, like processed food, it is necessarily everywhere.</p>
<p>Still, Roman March noted that &#8220;organic&#8221; is losing its lustre from overuse, so maybe Mozilla&#8217;s clever marketing is a little late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60282</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/#comment-60282</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;organic&quot; is already nearly meaningless. I do not see the point of making it even more meaningless by, yes, diluting the term even more.
What has been presented here to justify the term &quot;organic&quot; for Firefox could be worded equally well for Opera, Konqueror or even IE. This is silly. Stop it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;organic&#8221; is already nearly meaningless. I do not see the point of making it even more meaningless by, yes, diluting the term even more.<br />
What has been presented here to justify the term &#8220;organic&#8221; for Firefox could be worded equally well for Opera, Konqueror or even IE. This is silly. Stop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 06:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/#comment-60278</guid>
		<description>&quot;The reason consumers prefer organic goods in part are that they are better for you and your family. In a similar way, what weâ€™re suggesting is that Firefox is better for you because itâ€™s produced in a way that respects the user.&quot;
It would be horrible if this was the reason &#039;organic&#039; was used because a lot of organic foods aren&#039;t better for you or the environment. Most of organic food is more about marketing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The reason consumers prefer organic goods in part are that they are better for you and your family. In a similar way, what weâ€™re suggesting is that Firefox is better for you because itâ€™s produced in a way that respects the user.&#8221;<br />
It would be horrible if this was the reason &#8216;organic&#8217; was used because a lot of organic foods aren&#8217;t better for you or the environment. Most of organic food is more about marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60276</link>
		<dc:creator>Jono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/why-firefox-is-100-organic-software/#comment-60276</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably got more to do with the very natural substances the developers smoke while they&#039;re doing their coding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably got more to do with the very natural substances the developers smoke while they&#8217;re doing their coding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
