Comments on: Updated web browsers JavaScript benchmarks http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/ Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Firefox 3.1 Already Faster than Firefox 3.0.x | Green Mountain Geek http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-65377 Firefox 3.1 Already Faster than Firefox 3.0.x | Green Mountain Geek Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:37:59 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-65377 [...] in march of this year. Here’s the results graph from his second round of tests he published on March 16th post (results are measured in milliseconds and “WebKit” referred to the latest build of Safari for [...] [...] in march of this year. Here’s the results graph from his second round of tests he published on March 16th post (results are measured in milliseconds and “WebKit” referred to the latest build of Safari for [...]

]]> By: Firefox 3 - cada vez mais rápido e melhor | Open2Tech http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-60045 Firefox 3 - cada vez mais rápido e melhor | Open2Tech Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:12:45 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60045 [...] http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks [...] [...] http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks [...]

]]> By: Про Firefox Українською » Архів » Тести продуктивності JavaScript: Firefox 3 найкращий! http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-60036 Про Firefox Українською » Архів » Тести продуктивності JavaScript: Firefox 3 найкращий! Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:33:04 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60036 [...] Cabello (mozillalinks) нещодавно оновив результати тестування швидкодії [...] [...] Cabello (mozillalinks) нещодавно оновив результати тестування швидкодії [...]

]]> By: Yokujin Yokosuka http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-60004 Yokujin Yokosuka Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:50:13 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60004 Mine results are: Firefox 3b4: 4009.6ms +/- 0.5% WebKit r31055: 3602.2ms +/- 1.0% Mine results are:
Firefox 3b4: 4009.6ms +/- 0.5%
WebKit r31055: 3602.2ms +/- 1.0%

]]> By: HangLoose http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-59997 HangLoose Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:16:53 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59997 Browser war is BACK baby!!! Browser war is BACK baby!!!

]]> By: Asa Dotzler http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-59996 Asa Dotzler Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:01:21 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59996 How about putting them all together in one graph and then making some visual distinction between shipping, beta, and nightly. - A How about putting them all together in one graph and then making some visual distinction between shipping, beta, and nightly.

- A

]]> By: Tiago Sá http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-59992 Tiago Sá Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:01:25 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59992 <a href="http://webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B149,152,148,156,153%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B132,130,127,130,131%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B136,134,141,139,140%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B44,44,43,44,43%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B276,273,268,276,265%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B174,162,176,167,167%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B69,70,73,69,71%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B75,75,74,76,75%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B133,124,123,123,131%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B186,182,181,183,184%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B157,151,156,152,154%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B45,40,42,46,41%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B82,83,82,82,81%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B85,84,85,85,85%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B94,93,94,94,94%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B175,183,180,183,182%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B100,100,102,103,102%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B205,203,202,202,202%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B213,220,206,211,218%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B80,84,80,82,82%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B241,238,234,234,236%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B93,92,89,91,90%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B184,175,169,178,175%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B133,146,137,137,132%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B291,296,293,278,287%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B103,104,105,102,102%5D%7D" rel="nofollow">This</a> benchmark was done in a E6550 (stock speed), 2GB DDR2800, MSI P35Plat. Is it normal that I get 3629.8ms in Fx3b4 instead of the values on the post? This benchmark was done in a E6550 (stock speed), 2GB DDR2800, MSI P35Plat. Is it normal that I get 3629.8ms in Fx3b4 instead of the values on the post?

]]> By: Kirk M http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-59991 Kirk M Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:39:28 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59991 Good to hear that Firefox 3 is continuously improving. Can't wait till this one hits the streets. By the way, I get a slightly better figure for the latest nightly build (2008031605 Minefield/3.0b5pre). Thought the dev's had hit the best time they could but it seems they squeezed a bit more performance out of the browser. 5389.8ms +/- 1.0% Good to hear that Firefox 3 is continuously improving. Can’t wait till this one hits the streets.

By the way, I get a slightly better figure for the latest nightly build (2008031605 Minefield/3.0b5pre). Thought the dev’s had hit the best time they could but it seems they squeezed a bit more performance out of the browser.

5389.8ms +/- 1.0%

]]>