<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated web browsers JavaScript benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 - cada vez mais rápido e melhor &#124; Open2Tech</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60045</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 - cada vez mais rápido e melhor &#124; Open2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60045</guid>
		<description>[...] http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Про Firefox Українською &#187; Архів &#187; Тести продуктивності JavaScript: Firefox 3 найкращий!</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60036</link>
		<dc:creator>Про Firefox Українською &#187; Архів &#187; Тести продуктивності JavaScript: Firefox 3 найкращий!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60036</guid>
		<description>[...] Cabello (mozillalinks) нещодавно оновив результати тестування швидкодії [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cabello (mozillalinks) нещодавно оновив результати тестування швидкодії [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yokujin Yokosuka</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60004</link>
		<dc:creator>Yokujin Yokosuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-60004</guid>
		<description>Mine results are:
Firefox 3b4: 4009.6ms +/- 0.5%
WebKit r31055: 3602.2ms +/- 1.0%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine results are:<br />
Firefox 3b4: 4009.6ms +/- 0.5%<br />
WebKit r31055: 3602.2ms +/- 1.0%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HangLoose</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59997</link>
		<dc:creator>HangLoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59997</guid>
		<description>Browser war is BACK baby!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Browser war is BACK baby!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59996</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59996</guid>
		<description>How about putting them all together in one graph and then making some visual distinction between shipping, beta, and nightly. 

- A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about putting them all together in one graph and then making some visual distinction between shipping, beta, and nightly. </p>
<p>- A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Sá</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59992</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Sá</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59992</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B149,152,148,156,153%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B132,130,127,130,131%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B136,134,141,139,140%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B44,44,43,44,43%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B276,273,268,276,265%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B174,162,176,167,167%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B69,70,73,69,71%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B75,75,74,76,75%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B133,124,123,123,131%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B186,182,181,183,184%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B157,151,156,152,154%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B45,40,42,46,41%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B82,83,82,82,81%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B85,84,85,85,85%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B94,93,94,94,94%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B175,183,180,183,182%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B100,100,102,103,102%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B205,203,202,202,202%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B213,220,206,211,218%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B80,84,80,82,82%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B241,238,234,234,236%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B93,92,89,91,90%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B184,175,169,178,175%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B133,146,137,137,132%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B291,296,293,278,287%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B103,104,105,102,102%5D%7D" rel="nofollow"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; benchmark was done in a E6550 (stock speed), 2GB DDR2800, MSI P35Plat. Is it normal that I get 3629.8ms in Fx3b4 instead of the values on the post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B149,152,148,156,153%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B132,130,127,130,131%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B136,134,141,139,140%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B44,44,43,44,43%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B276,273,268,276,265%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B174,162,176,167,167%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B69,70,73,69,71%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B75,75,74,76,75%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B133,124,123,123,131%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B186,182,181,183,184%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B157,151,156,152,154%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B45,40,42,46,41%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B82,83,82,82,81%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B85,84,85,85,85%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B94,93,94,94,94%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B175,183,180,183,182%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B100,100,102,103,102%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B205,203,202,202,202%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B213,220,206,211,218%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B80,84,80,82,82%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B241,238,234,234,236%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B93,92,89,91,90%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B184,175,169,178,175%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B133,146,137,137,132%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B291,296,293,278,287%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B103,104,105,102,102%5D%7D" rel="nofollow">This</a> benchmark was done in a E6550 (stock speed), 2GB DDR2800, MSI P35Plat. Is it normal that I get 3629.8ms in Fx3b4 instead of the values on the post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk M</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59991</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/updated-web-browsers-javascript-benchmarks/#comment-59991</guid>
		<description>Good to hear that Firefox 3 is continuously improving. Can't wait till this one hits the streets.

By the way, I get a slightly better figure for the latest nightly build (2008031605 Minefield/3.0b5pre). Thought the dev's had hit the best time they could but it seems they squeezed a bit more performance out of the browser.

5389.8ms +/- 1.0%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear that Firefox 3 is continuously improving. Can&#8217;t wait till this one hits the streets.</p>
<p>By the way, I get a slightly better figure for the latest nightly build (2008031605 Minefield/3.0b5pre). Thought the dev&#8217;s had hit the best time they could but it seems they squeezed a bit more performance out of the browser.</p>
<p>5389.8ms +/- 1.0%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
