<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miro 1.2 update is out with the latest Mozilla 1.9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/#comment-60355</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/#comment-60355</guid>
		<description>Does Miro work on Windows Vista at least now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Miro work on Windows Vista at least now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/#comment-60190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/03/miro-12-update-is-out-with-the-latest-mozilla-19/#comment-60190</guid>
		<description>If Miro should have the same performance improvements as Firefox 3 why does it still use this much memory AND doesn't give it back? It is using 327MB private bites and 401MB commit. It is sitting in the systemtray right now and I think it should be using no more than 32MB with all it's helper processes combined.
I really hope that the next really will get the same memory improvements as Firefox 3. I really love the speed improvement though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Miro should have the same performance improvements as Firefox 3 why does it still use this much memory AND doesn&#8217;t give it back? It is using 327MB private bites and 401MB commit. It is sitting in the systemtray right now and I think it should be using no more than 32MB with all it&#8217;s helper processes combined.<br />
I really hope that the next really will get the same memory improvements as Firefox 3. I really love the speed improvement though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
