<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New mozilla.com to feature an organic design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60280</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60280</guid>
		<description>I agree with JP -- this design is ugly, without concept, and unnecessary. "Organic" is a meaningless buzzword. Nothing of the design conveys anything that Firefox excels in or Mozilla.org stands for. Maybe this is the mainstream taste of youngsters with even uglier Myspace pages. It is a pathetic failure for a webpage like mozilla.org.
Nothing at all would have been better than this insult of the eye and the mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with JP &#8212; this design is ugly, without concept, and unnecessary. &#8220;Organic&#8221; is a meaningless buzzword. Nothing of the design conveys anything that Firefox excels in or Mozilla.org stands for. Maybe this is the mainstream taste of youngsters with even uglier Myspace pages. It is a pathetic failure for a webpage like mozilla.org.<br />
Nothing at all would have been better than this insult of the eye and the mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Firefox is 100% organic software? : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60265</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Firefox is 100% organic software? : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60265</guid>
		<description>[...] recently, Mozilla has started using the term organic as a way to describe Firefox. For example, the new mozilla.com prototypes feature trees, animals and balloons to suggest this, and the ongoing Firefox 3 T-shirt design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently, Mozilla has started using the term organic as a way to describe Firefox. For example, the new mozilla.com prototypes feature trees, animals and balloons to suggest this, and the ongoing Firefox 3 T-shirt design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Firefox is 100% organic software? : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60266</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Firefox is 100% organic software? : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-60266</guid>
		<description>[...] recently, Mozilla has started using the term organic as a way to describe Firefox. For example, the new mozilla.com prototypes feature trees, animals and balloons to suggest this, and the ongoing Firefox 3 T-shirt design [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently, Mozilla has started using the term organic as a way to describe Firefox. For example, the new mozilla.com prototypes feature trees, animals and balloons to suggest this, and the ongoing Firefox 3 T-shirt design [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradwJensen</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-59090</link>
		<dc:creator>BradwJensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-59090</guid>
		<description>The navigation bar is WAY too thick..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The navigation bar is WAY too thick..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onicSockPuppet</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58768</link>
		<dc:creator>onicSockPuppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58768</guid>
		<description>The new design rocks.  Don't listen to JP, he's an idiot.  (And yes, JP, mass appeal is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new design rocks.  Don&#8217;t listen to JP, he&#8217;s an idiot.  (And yes, JP, mass appeal is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Lindo</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58670</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Lindo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58670</guid>
		<description>Beautiful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diseño de la nueva web de Mozilla.com… para cuando se lance el Firefox 3, a finales de este año :</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58637</link>
		<dc:creator>Diseño de la nueva web de Mozilla.com… para cuando se lance el Firefox 3, a finales de este año :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58637</guid>
		<description>[...] Mozilla está trabajando en el nuevo diseño de su web, para cuando se lance la versión definitiva de Firefox 3, que se espera que sea a finales de este año. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla está trabajando en el nuevo diseño de su web, para cuando se lance la versión definitiva de Firefox 3, que se espera que sea a finales de este año. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58635</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58635</guid>
		<description>I know that everything must be designed to death nowadays to become mass-compatible, but is it really necessary to put the design into the hands of a company whose web page is nothing but flash?
Form over function, prettyness over usefulness ... is it really necessary to take that road with Firefox and its web sites? 

I dont want to see totally unmotivated balloons and little animals in trees on a browser website just because it is "pretty".
Baroque Kitsch for the masses designed by overpaid kids with an Apple computer ... does Mozilla.org have to join this cult and spend money on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that everything must be designed to death nowadays to become mass-compatible, but is it really necessary to put the design into the hands of a company whose web page is nothing but flash?<br />
Form over function, prettyness over usefulness &#8230; is it really necessary to take that road with Firefox and its web sites? </p>
<p>I dont want to see totally unmotivated balloons and little animals in trees on a browser website just because it is &#8220;pretty&#8221;.<br />
Baroque Kitsch for the masses designed by overpaid kids with an Apple computer &#8230; does Mozilla.org have to join this cult and spend money on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58611</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/new-mozillacom-to-feature-an-organic-design/#comment-58611</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a step up for the developers at Mozilla. Honestly, the new page is looking good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a step up for the developers at Mozilla. Honestly, the new page is looking good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
