Comments on: Secunia 2007 report on web browsers security http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/ Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Kr±g Starszoharcerski “Matrix” » Blog Archive » Bezpieczeñstwo w roku 2007 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/comment-page-1/#comment-57448 Kr±g Starszoharcerski “Matrix” » Blog Archive » Bezpieczeñstwo w roku 2007 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:55:24 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/#comment-57448 [...] siê g³osy, ¿e Fx jest najbardziej niebezpieczn± przegl±dark± itd. Kiedy jednak popatrzy siê na bardziej szczegó³owe zestawienie, okazuje siê, ¿e IE by³ nara¿ony na ataki przez 174 dni w roku, natomiast Fx “tylko” [...] [...] siê g³osy, ¿e Fx jest najbardziej niebezpieczn± przegl±dark± itd. Kiedy jednak popatrzy siê na bardziej szczegó³owe zestawienie, okazuje siê, ¿e IE by³ nara¿ony na ataki przez 174 dni w roku, natomiast Fx “tylko” [...]

]]> By: Percy Cabello http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/comment-page-1/#comment-57140 Percy Cabello Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:09:59 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/#comment-57140 Omid, thanks for the corrections. I've updated the article. Omid, thanks for the corrections. I’ve updated the article.

]]> By: Omid http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/comment-page-1/#comment-57136 Omid Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:55:00 +0000 http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/01/secunia-2007-report-on-web-browsers-security/#comment-57136 Nice article :) but... There are two typos in the article, in second paragraph: "...Firefox had the most reported vunerabilties with 64, followed by Internet Explorer with 64, and Opera and Safari with 14 each..." "vunerabilties" and second "64" should change: "...Firefox had the most reported vulnerabilities with 64, followed by Internet Explorer with 43, and Opera and Safari with 14 each." Nice article :)

but…

There are two typos in the article, in second paragraph:

“…Firefox had the most reported vunerabilties with 64, followed by Internet Explorer with 64, and Opera and Safari with 14 each…”

“vunerabilties” and second “64″ should change:

“…Firefox had the most reported vulnerabilities with 64, followed by Internet Explorer with 43, and Opera and Safari with 14 each.”

]]>