<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next steps for Firefox 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Tanner</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56995</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56995</guid>
		<description>Again, the History (cntl-H) gets no loving.
For instance, I have 20 web pages titled "no title".
I cannot see the URLs of any of these pages until I go to the actual web site.

Why is is so hard to show URls on mouse over or something, maybe a properties menu tab.  As it is cntl-H history is useless.  The alt-S function is a gimmick not worth a damn either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the History (cntl-H) gets no loving.<br />
For instance, I have 20 web pages titled &#8220;no title&#8221;.<br />
I cannot see the URLs of any of these pages until I go to the actual web site.</p>
<p>Why is is so hard to show URls on mouse over or something, maybe a properties menu tab.  As it is cntl-H history is useless.  The alt-S function is a gimmick not worth a damn either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cuak</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56282</link>
		<dc:creator>Cuak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56282</guid>
		<description>Guys,

Please use 'Fx' to abbreviate Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>Please use &#8216;Fx&#8217; to abbreviate Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3 location bar just became almighty : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56022</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3 location bar just became almighty : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-56022</guid>
		<description>[...] expected, two more features have been added and will be available for Beta 2. The autocomplete list now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expected, two more features have been added and will be available for Beta 2. The autocomplete list now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Is Next For Firefox 3.0?</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55950</link>
		<dc:creator>What Is Next For Firefox 3.0?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55950</guid>
		<description>[...] Links has written about the next steps for Firefox 3.0, now that it has entered beta.   It looks like we&#8217;ve got some continued improvements in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links has written about the next steps for Firefox 3.0, now that it has entered beta.   It looks like we&#8217;ve got some continued improvements in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxiewire.com</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55909</link>
		<dc:creator>foxiewire.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55909</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Next steps for Firefox 3 : Mozilla Links&lt;/strong&gt;

Firefox 3 Beta 1 is already free in the open, but Firefox 3 development doesn’t stop and developers keep tweaking and perfecting the long list of new features and changes .Visual RefreshFirst and certainly most notable the visual refresh that wil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Next steps for Firefox 3 : Mozilla Links</strong></p>
<p>Firefox 3 Beta 1 is already free in the open, but Firefox 3 development doesn’t stop and developers keep tweaking and perfecting the long list of new features and changes .</p>
<p>Visual Refresh</p>
<p>First and certainly most notable the visual refresh that wil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55896</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55896</guid>
		<description>Percy, reading a roc's blog post recently I learned the &#62;VIDEO&#60; tag won't make it into FF3 since the tag specification has changed. Not sure if it was in the same blog post, but enabling support for offline content is not clear too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Percy, reading a roc&#8217;s blog post recently I learned the &gt;VIDEO&lt; tag won&#8217;t make it into FF3 since the tag specification has changed. Not sure if it was in the same blog post, but enabling support for offline content is not clear too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55893</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55893</guid>
		<description>funTomas, tagging is already available since Alpha 8. Offline web app support is even older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funTomas, tagging is already available since Alpha 8. Offline web app support is even older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funTomas</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55889</link>
		<dc:creator>funTomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55889</guid>
		<description>Regarding to  tag support, it's pity it won't make it into FF3. AFAIK, even the last version of Opera supports it now.
But what I'm missing in your preview, is the offline support. I'm not sure and am really eager to know whether we'll find it enabled in FF3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding to  tag support, it&#8217;s pity it won&#8217;t make it into FF3. AFAIK, even the last version of Opera supports it now.<br />
But what I&#8217;m missing in your preview, is the offline support. I&#8217;m not sure and am really eager to know whether we&#8217;ll find it enabled in FF3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55885</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/11/next-steps-for-firefox-3/#comment-55885</guid>
		<description>My bet's on mid march. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bet&#8217;s on mid march. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
