<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big plans for SeaMonkey 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-65727</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-65727</guid>
		<description>SeaMonkey is fast. Let's not do anything to slow it down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SeaMonkey is fast. Let&#8217;s not do anything to slow it down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yandy</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-65524</link>
		<dc:creator>yandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-65524</guid>
		<description>i agree on the last comment, seamonkey should offer a bundle of communication, messaging, multimedia, calendar, ftp,
office and webdevelopment packet, that can be used out of the box. Right now most of them are 
missing. I really hope they come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree on the last comment, seamonkey should offer a bundle of communication, messaging, multimedia, calendar, ftp,<br />
office and webdevelopment packet, that can be used out of the box. Right now most of them are<br />
missing. I really hope they come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kephryn</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-62292</link>
		<dc:creator>Kephryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-62292</guid>
		<description>I really hope that they do change a lot,  I don't really mind the user interface, any one could get accustom to changes, I think the real point was to create a full featured web bundle.

I wouldn't mind seeing better use of XUL and its intended purposes, I don't like seeing multiple XUL runners, Just one is fine.

I also would not mind seeing Firefox extensions integrated straight into SeaMonkey (FireFTP,FireBug,etc) to create the Ultimate Web Bundle. 

Keep the nostalgic look and feel as optional, the 21st century we could all use some change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope that they do change a lot,  I don&#8217;t really mind the user interface, any one could get accustom to changes, I think the real point was to create a full featured web bundle.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing better use of XUL and its intended purposes, I don&#8217;t like seeing multiple XUL runners, Just one is fine.</p>
<p>I also would not mind seeing Firefox extensions integrated straight into SeaMonkey (FireFTP,FireBug,etc) to create the Ultimate Web Bundle. </p>
<p>Keep the nostalgic look and feel as optional, the 21st century we could all use some change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mozilla user</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-61644</link>
		<dc:creator>mozilla user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-61644</guid>
		<description>I really hope they dont change it too much, and especially not towards firefox look
Making it easier to use add-ons is ok, but the whole point of seamonkey is to
retain the look and feel of the original mozilla
Firefox started out being faster, but now feels super sluggish compared to seamonkey
And No, firefox 3 is not faster, even though they plugged the memory-leaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope they dont change it too much, and especially not towards firefox look<br />
Making it easier to use add-ons is ok, but the whole point of seamonkey is to<br />
retain the look and feel of the original mozilla<br />
Firefox started out being faster, but now feels super sluggish compared to seamonkey<br />
And No, firefox 3 is not faster, even though they plugged the memory-leaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Hartnell</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-61217</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Hartnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/10/big-plans-for-seamonkey-2/#comment-61217</guid>
		<description>SeaMonkey 2 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SeaMonkey 2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
