<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird gets a new spell checker, Firefox may follow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:50:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-77564</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-77564</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird&#039;s spell check is a complete disgrace!! I write in 3 languages and have no problem with the others. It is even more important for the English dictionary to be good because so many like myself, who&#039;s first language is not English, have to write it on the Internet. I constantly have to find the right spelling by going to Google ... maybe I should switch to Google Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird&#8217;s spell check is a complete disgrace!! I write in 3 languages and have no problem with the others. It is even more important for the English dictionary to be good because so many like myself, who&#8217;s first language is not English, have to write it on the Internet. I constantly have to find the right spelling by going to Google &#8230; maybe I should switch to Google Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-77286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-77286</guid>
		<description>The lexical analyzer in GNU Aspell looks for common typing errors on QWERTY keyboards, but the current Firefox spellchecker (Hunspell) is more internationalizable, and better supported on different platforms. They want one spellchecker for everything (Aspell is designed specifically for English), even if it does the job poorly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lexical analyzer in GNU Aspell looks for common typing errors on QWERTY keyboards, but the current Firefox spellchecker (Hunspell) is more internationalizable, and better supported on different platforms. They want one spellchecker for everything (Aspell is designed specifically for English), even if it does the job poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-77284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-77284</guid>
		<description>Correct suggestions is where GNU Aspell shines. The lexical analyzer takes into account common typos on QWERTY keyboards, as well as homophone and other errors. Used with the right options, it is usually about 98% probability that what you meant to type will be in the suggestion list.

Unfortunately, Aspell is designed for English. Hunspell, which was originally designed for Hungarian, is apparently better for internationalization (read: the one spell checker for everyone, because we don&#039;t want to have to maintain different versions of Thunderbird and Firefox for different languages).  Hunspell also has better support across different platforms, while Aspell is maintained primarily for Un*x and Un*x-like systems (Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, etc). Even the Opera development group dumped Aspell in favor of Hunspell for Opera 10.

You paste into Word; I paste into an editor that uses Aspell (which I&#039;ve found makes much better suggestions than Word). {shrug} What else can a body do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct suggestions is where GNU Aspell shines. The lexical analyzer takes into account common typos on QWERTY keyboards, as well as homophone and other errors. Used with the right options, it is usually about 98% probability that what you meant to type will be in the suggestion list.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Aspell is designed for English. Hunspell, which was originally designed for Hungarian, is apparently better for internationalization (read: the one spell checker for everyone, because we don&#8217;t want to have to maintain different versions of Thunderbird and Firefox for different languages).  Hunspell also has better support across different platforms, while Aspell is maintained primarily for Un*x and Un*x-like systems (Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OS X, etc). Even the Opera development group dumped Aspell in favor of Hunspell for Opera 10.</p>
<p>You paste into Word; I paste into an editor that uses Aspell (which I&#8217;ve found makes much better suggestions than Word). {shrug} What else can a body do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-75432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-75432</guid>
		<description>Fire fox spell checker..
very poor!  pick list bad.

Suggest match 1 letter of word match and match last letter. 

The match 2 letter of word then match second from last.

repeat.



This works from most English words



----
Also, &quot;add word&quot; does to add: &quot;Wal-Mart&quot;
Nor allow phrase &quot; United States Navy&quot;

------

The best spell checker is in Word Perfect. 
It has the best look function, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fire fox spell checker..<br />
very poor!  pick list bad.</p>
<p>Suggest match 1 letter of word match and match last letter. </p>
<p>The match 2 letter of word then match second from last.</p>
<p>repeat.</p>
<p>This works from most English words</p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
Also, &#8220;add word&#8221; does to add: &#8220;Wal-Mart&#8221;<br />
Nor allow phrase &#8221; United States Navy&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The best spell checker is in Word Perfect.<br />
It has the best look function, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-71596</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-71596</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird&#039;s spell check is so horrible.An otherwise great product dragged down by that. I type fast and need a spell checker that works. And this idiot program can&#039;t replace a capitalized word at the beginning of sentence with a capitalized word.

Actually went back to Outlook Express because of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird&#8217;s spell check is so horrible.An otherwise great product dragged down by that. I type fast and need a spell checker that works. And this idiot program can&#8217;t replace a capitalized word at the beginning of sentence with a capitalized word.</p>
<p>Actually went back to Outlook Express because of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyrone</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-71014</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-71014</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Hunspell is notoriously poor at making correct spelling suggestions even when given rather trivial misspellings. It is so poor, that I have found that quite often I have to cut &amp; paste the email into Word for spell check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Hunspell is notoriously poor at making correct spelling suggestions even when given rather trivial misspellings. It is so poor, that I have found that quite often I have to cut &amp; paste the email into Word for spell check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icoste</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-69102</link>
		<dc:creator>icoste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-69102</guid>
		<description>Im my honest opinion, firefox is great (the stable versions), and a lot better than IE. 

But when it comes to mail clients outlook is far better than thunderbird. I think that Mozilla need to look again at what they are doing as ive thought about using thunderbird several times but always stuck with outlook.

Hopefully one day thunderbird will improve because im sure there is a lot of room for improvement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im my honest opinion, firefox is great (the stable versions), and a lot better than IE. </p>
<p>But when it comes to mail clients outlook is far better than thunderbird. I think that Mozilla need to look again at what they are doing as ive thought about using thunderbird several times but always stuck with outlook.</p>
<p>Hopefully one day thunderbird will improve because im sure there is a lot of room for improvement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Spencer</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-66079</link>
		<dc:creator>John Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-66079</guid>
		<description>The thunderbird spell checker is dead in the water. 
you have to recheck line after line after line cos the thunderbird
spell checker just looks at your words and goes huh what.
Jeez there it is, TOOLs composition, you tick the box and zip.
Dead as a dodo doo doo nothing. God make another one
that works or something, it&#039;s a piece of ap.

The only thing it&#039;s good at is making you look like a tit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thunderbird spell checker is dead in the water.<br />
you have to recheck line after line after line cos the thunderbird<br />
spell checker just looks at your words and goes huh what.<br />
Jeez there it is, TOOLs composition, you tick the box and zip.<br />
Dead as a dodo doo doo nothing. God make another one<br />
that works or something, it&#8217;s a piece of ap.</p>
<p>The only thing it&#8217;s good at is making you look like a tit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick mcaman</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-65183</link>
		<dc:creator>nick mcaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-65183</guid>
		<description>My spell checker finds nothing as well. Am I doing something wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spell checker finds nothing as well. Am I doing something wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris Patton</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-60226</link>
		<dc:creator>chris Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-60226</guid>
		<description>I have just downloaded thunderbird and it works perfectly with one exception. The spellchecker simply is inactive. I tryed to download load it from monzilla without sucess. What can I do/ You can probbably tell from ths that my speling is atrocious. All advice welcome Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just downloaded thunderbird and it works perfectly with one exception. The spellchecker simply is inactive. I tryed to download load it from monzilla without sucess. What can I do/ You can probbably tell from ths that my speling is atrocious. All advice welcome Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A deep look to Firefox 3 Beta 3 : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-57794</link>
		<dc:creator>A deep look to Firefox 3 Beta 3 : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-57794</guid>
		<description>[...] MySpell spell-checking engine has been replaced with Hunspell which does a better job handling complex languages including Asians, Hungarian, Basque, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MySpell spell-checking engine has been replaced with Hunspell which does a better job handling complex languages including Asians, Hungarian, Basque, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Davis</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-57743</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-57743</guid>
		<description>The spelling check in Firefox is far from perfect.

Firstly they offer no help to the bad typist. Since we are all typists now -  and untrained in the main - we have more typing errors than spelling errors - and so-called spell checkers should take account of this.

I often mistype &quot;Politics&quot; as &quot;POlitics&quot; but the spell-checker is no help here. Firefox would be better with a better spelling and typing checker - and a way for people to add their own suggestions as to the word they meant to type</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spelling check in Firefox is far from perfect.</p>
<p>Firstly they offer no help to the bad typist. Since we are all typists now &#8211;  and untrained in the main &#8211; we have more typing errors than spelling errors &#8211; and so-called spell checkers should take account of this.</p>
<p>I often mistype &#8220;Politics&#8221; as &#8220;POlitics&#8221; but the spell-checker is no help here. Firefox would be better with a better spelling and typing checker &#8211; and a way for people to add their own suggestions as to the word they meant to type</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dodgen</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-56271</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dodgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-56271</guid>
		<description>Any way to get the spell checker to weight the first character higher when giving suggestions?
example:

&quot;asitance&quot; comes back with &quot;hesitance&quot; and other derivativesÂ when I missspell &quot;assistance&quot;

&quot;dirivitives&quot; offers up &quot;primitiveness&quot; when MS Outlook finds &quot;derivatives&quot; as the first hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way to get the spell checker to weight the first character higher when giving suggestions?<br />
example:</p>
<p>&#8220;asitance&#8221; comes back with &#8220;hesitance&#8221; and other derivativesÂ when I missspell &#8220;assistance&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;dirivitives&#8221; offers up &#8220;primitiveness&#8221; when MS Outlook finds &#8220;derivatives&#8221; as the first hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Boland</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-55637</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Boland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-55637</guid>
		<description>My spell checker finds nothing. I have the spell checker turned on (Tools/options/composition) but it fails to find even the simplest misspelled word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My spell checker finds nothing. I have the spell checker turned on (Tools/options/composition) but it fails to find even the simplest misspelled word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim R</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-55551</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-55551</guid>
		<description>Thunderbird spell check seems to run but never finds any errors. Have I installed it incorrectly? How can I tun spell checking on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thunderbird spell check seems to run but never finds any errors. Have I installed it incorrectly? How can I tun spell checking on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dafin Aziz</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-51908</link>
		<dc:creator>Dafin Aziz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-51908</guid>
		<description>Can they please add a transparent(variable opacity?) spell check window. It would help a lot, eg when seeing sentences in context etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can they please add a transparent(variable opacity?) spell check window. It would help a lot, eg when seeing sentences in context etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Shumate</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-51659</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Shumate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-51659</guid>
		<description>Good... I always thought Firefox&#039;s Spell Check was horrible.  (For instance: I just misspelled SPELL as speel and spell was not a suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good&#8230; I always thought Firefox&#8217;s Spell Check was horrible.  (For instance: I just misspelled SPELL as speel and spell was not a suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-51471</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 05:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-51471</guid>
		<description>Morphological analysis... does that mean that it will be ... umm ... smarter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morphological analysis&#8230; does that mean that it will be &#8230; umm &#8230; smarter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kernel Source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cambio de corrector ortogrÃ¡fico en Thunderbird</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-51463</link>
		<dc:creator>Kernel Source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cambio de corrector ortogrÃ¡fico en Thunderbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-51463</guid>
		<description>[...] VÃ­a: Mozilla Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃ­a: Mozilla Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Spell Check For TBird 3 &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-51458</link>
		<dc:creator>New Spell Check For TBird 3 &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/07/thunderbird-gets-a-new-spell-checker-firefox-may-follow/#comment-51458</guid>
		<description>[...] Â News Source: Mozilla Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â News Source: Mozilla Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
