<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows Beta released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-60353</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-60353</guid>
		<description>Safari can pass ACID test? Oh yea, but Safari can&#039;t pass google.com test :) So, it is a software for its start page, not for work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari can pass ACID test? Oh yea, but Safari can&#8217;t pass google.com test :) So, it is a software for its start page, not for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-51032</link>
		<dc:creator>Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 03:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-51032</guid>
		<description>[...] Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week. There is so much to look and try in a web browser that I decided to compile this comparative table highlighting pros and cons of each browser. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week. There is so much to look and try in a web browser that I decided to compile this comparative table highlighting pros and cons of each browser. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50988</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50988</guid>
		<description>Lantz, yes Firefox 2 doesn&#039;t pass the Acid2 test. Firefox 3 will: http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/12/firefox-3-alpha-1-released-yes-it-matters/

Safari was the first, Opera followed, IE sometime in the future. Maybe. Well, don&#039;t hold your breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lantz, yes Firefox 2 doesn&#8217;t pass the Acid2 test. Firefox 3 will: <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/12/firefox-3-alpha-1-released-yes-it-matters/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/12/firefox-3-alpha-1-released-yes-it-matters/</a></p>
<p>Safari was the first, Opera followed, IE sometime in the future. Maybe. Well, don&#8217;t hold your breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lantz</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50987</link>
		<dc:creator>Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50987</guid>
		<description>Be sure to test Safari beta, IE 6, IE 7, Firefox 2 or whatever browser you use in Windows against the Web Standards to see how it fares.  You will be unpleasantly surprised to see how the most popular browser on Windows does, how sad.

The Acid 2 Test
http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html

List of compliant browsers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2#Non-compliant_browsers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be sure to test Safari beta, IE 6, IE 7, Firefox 2 or whatever browser you use in Windows against the Web Standards to see how it fares.  You will be unpleasantly surprised to see how the most popular browser on Windows does, how sad.</p>
<p>The Acid 2 Test<br />
<a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html</a></p>
<p>List of compliant browsers<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2#Non-compliant_browsers" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2#Non-compliant_browsers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50918</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50918</guid>
		<description>Like Firefox 3 and Safari 3, Opera 9.5 is currently in development. &quot;Forthcoming&quot; is what&#039;s missing there. Now corrected. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Firefox 3 and Safari 3, Opera 9.5 is currently in development. &#8220;Forthcoming&#8221; is what&#8217;s missing there. Now corrected. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DesignLab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari para Windows</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50907</link>
		<dc:creator>DesignLab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari para Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50907</guid>
		<description>[...] Itâ€™s a beta.   Â http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Itâ€™s a beta.   Â http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Anthony Knapp</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50900</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Anthony Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 05:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50900</guid>
		<description>Nitpick: Opera is 9.21, not 9.5. Also, Netscape Navigator is 9.0b, for what that&#039;s worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitpick: Opera is 9.21, not 9.5. Also, Netscape Navigator is 9.0b, for what that&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50887</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50887</guid>
		<description>Okay, now that is like just weird!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, now that is like just weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Safari For Windows? How weird! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-50886</link>
		<dc:creator>Safari For Windows? How weird! &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/safari-for-windows/#comment-50886</guid>
		<description>[...] News Source: Mozilla Links &gt;&gt; Safari for Windows Beta released [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Source: Mozilla Links &gt;&gt; Safari for Windows Beta released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
