<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/</link>
	<description>Your source for Firefox, Thunderbird, Camino, SeaMonkey news, tips and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Safari sucks</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64957</link>
		<dc:creator>Safari sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64957</guid>
		<description>I had started using Safari, i was using Windows. But cos of this Safari most of the times windows crashed. I hav uninstalled it. FF 3 roxxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had started using Safari, i was using Windows. But cos of this Safari most of the times windows crashed. I hav uninstalled it. FF 3 roxxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAMMYC</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64948</link>
		<dc:creator>JAMMYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64948</guid>
		<description>Firefox 3 just blows Safari out of the water. A fairer fight would be Webkit vs Firefox.

BTW: this thing was done ages ago before all those new features came into place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 just blows Safari out of the water. A fairer fight would be Webkit vs Firefox.</p>
<p>BTW: this thing was done ages ago before all those new features came into place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advait Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64261</link>
		<dc:creator>Advait Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-64261</guid>
		<description>You can tell where a link will take you on safari. Just look at the bottom left-hand corner of the frame. Well, atleast that's how it works on Mac OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell where a link will take you on safari. Just look at the bottom left-hand corner of the frame. Well, atleast that&#8217;s how it works on Mac OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morbus</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-62237</link>
		<dc:creator>Morbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-62237</guid>
		<description>And by "that" I mean: http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/4922/62925503mv8.jpg

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by &#8220;that&#8221; I mean: <a href="http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/4922/62925503mv8.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/4922/62925503mv8.jpg</a></p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morbus</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-62234</link>
		<dc:creator>Morbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-62234</guid>
		<description>Safari sucks so much I can't even begin to describe it. It's invasive and intrusive on windows, doesn't work right, missing a few little things, and generally feels wrong for a long time Firefox+lotsandlotsofextensions user.

It is fair to include extensions in the comparison. In fact, it's so much fair that is the reason why Firefox is better than every other browser out there. It's faster (Fx3, of course), it's THE fastest, it's secure (and with NoScript, AdBlock Plus and CS Lite it's THE most secure) and it's very customizable. You get what you want to get, you have what you want to have. You work how you want to work. Of course, if you're one of those paranoid geeks that say extensions are a security issue and whatnot, then you don't get the sweet candy Firefox has to offer. Including resizeable textareas, using an extension with the same name. And lots more, of course. It's the beauty of open source.

And with all this safari on windows and stuff, I think the browser wars really do benefit from it, because Internet Explorer will have to work harder, will have to become more standard compliant, and generally tips the ballance more to users choosing what browser to use.

And if they use Safari and they like it, that's always a good thing. It's always a good thing when people use browsers that they like and love. I for one love my Firefox:

&lt;a href="http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/4922/62925503mv8.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

BEAT THAT SUCKA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari sucks so much I can&#8217;t even begin to describe it. It&#8217;s invasive and intrusive on windows, doesn&#8217;t work right, missing a few little things, and generally feels wrong for a long time Firefox+lotsandlotsofextensions user.</p>
<p>It is fair to include extensions in the comparison. In fact, it&#8217;s so much fair that is the reason why Firefox is better than every other browser out there. It&#8217;s faster (Fx3, of course), it&#8217;s THE fastest, it&#8217;s secure (and with NoScript, AdBlock Plus and CS Lite it&#8217;s THE most secure) and it&#8217;s very customizable. You get what you want to get, you have what you want to have. You work how you want to work. Of course, if you&#8217;re one of those paranoid geeks that say extensions are a security issue and whatnot, then you don&#8217;t get the sweet candy Firefox has to offer. Including resizeable textareas, using an extension with the same name. And lots more, of course. It&#8217;s the beauty of open source.</p>
<p>And with all this safari on windows and stuff, I think the browser wars really do benefit from it, because Internet Explorer will have to work harder, will have to become more standard compliant, and generally tips the ballance more to users choosing what browser to use.</p>
<p>And if they use Safari and they like it, that&#8217;s always a good thing. It&#8217;s always a good thing when people use browsers that they like and love. I for one love my Firefox:</p>
<p><a href="http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/4922/62925503mv8.jpg" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
<p>BEAT THAT SUCKA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-60836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-60836</guid>
		<description>Personally i prefer firefox.

The only reason i refuse to use any apple software on my pc is because i hate the interface,it does not look like a windows app nor does it behave like a windows app. When they decide to use the windows API to draw the interface of all their apps than i will give it ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i prefer firefox.</p>
<p>The only reason i refuse to use any apple software on my pc is because i hate the interface,it does not look like a windows app nor does it behave like a windows app. When they decide to use the windows API to draw the interface of all their apps than i will give it ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-60048</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-60048</guid>
		<description>incorrect/out-of-date info.
few things:
   -you can access manually entered website by pressing Alt+Enter
   -there is a feature like restore session: Reopen All Windows From Last Session (found under                History)
there are many reasons for switching to Safari:
 -more eye candy. nice blue highlight when entering text, adding bookmarks, 
 -simplicity. Safari is not clogged up with add-ons and buttons. easy to learn
 -new features: resizeable text field, drag tab off to make it a new window (very nice visual effect), merge all windows, ability to import both ie and safari favorites and bookmarks,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>incorrect/out-of-date info.<br />
few things:<br />
   -you can access manually entered website by pressing Alt+Enter<br />
   -there is a feature like restore session: Reopen All Windows From Last Session (found under                History)<br />
there are many reasons for switching to Safari:<br />
 -more eye candy. nice blue highlight when entering text, adding bookmarks,<br />
 -simplicity. Safari is not clogged up with add-ons and buttons. easy to learn<br />
 -new features: resizeable text field, drag tab off to make it a new window (very nice visual effect), merge all windows, ability to import both ie and safari favorites and bookmarks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Q</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57601</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57601</guid>
		<description>Safari over-saturates the JPGs... It's fine for photographs but it's a pain when you background color doesn't match the over saturated JPG.

FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari over-saturates the JPGs&#8230; It&#8217;s fine for photographs but it&#8217;s a pain when you background color doesn&#8217;t match the over saturated JPG.</p>
<p>FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hans</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57508</link>
		<dc:creator>hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57508</guid>
		<description>Clearly, this article wreaks of bias. But that's what I like about it.

My concern is not with Percy, bur rather with the reader who couldn't detect the apparent bias all over this article. "Firefox 3 passes Acid2 test", though, I think is a giveaway enough. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, this article wreaks of bias. But that&#8217;s what I like about it.</p>
<p>My concern is not with Percy, bur rather with the reader who couldn&#8217;t detect the apparent bias all over this article. &#8220;Firefox 3 passes Acid2 test&#8221;, though, I think is a giveaway enough. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mind Mining Medium &#187; Must Have Mac Apps: Part I - Free Apps</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57134</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind Mining Medium &#187; Must Have Mac Apps: Part I - Free Apps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-57134</guid>
		<description>[...] grown to love Firefox a lot more. There is so much to say about Firefox. I would suggest reading &#8220;Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari&#8221; or doing your own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grown to love Firefox a lot more. There is so much to say about Firefox. I would suggest reading &#8220;Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari&#8221; or doing your own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-56736</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-56736</guid>
		<description>This was tested using Safari 2 for Mac OS X. Safari 3 for Windows should only be different by replacing cmd with ctrl.

- Open a new tab: right click and select “New tab” out of a menu of two items, one of which is “Reload all tabs”

- Open a new tab: press cmd-T.

- Looks and acts totally out of place: it was designed to fit with OSX, surprisingly enough.

- Little bit of toolbar customization available. Not as much as in Firefox, though.

- Open a manually entered web address in a new tab: cmd-shift-Enter. In a new background tab: cmd-Enter.

- Automatic updates: tell Apple Software Update to run itself regularly.

- http://pimpmysafari.com/

- You never mentioned that Safari is, on average, almost twice as fast as Firefox. (apple.com/safari)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was tested using Safari 2 for Mac OS X. Safari 3 for Windows should only be different by replacing cmd with ctrl.</p>
<p>- Open a new tab: right click and select “New tab” out of a menu of two items, one of which is “Reload all tabs”</p>
<p>- Open a new tab: press cmd-T.</p>
<p>- Looks and acts totally out of place: it was designed to fit with OSX, surprisingly enough.</p>
<p>- Little bit of toolbar customization available. Not as much as in Firefox, though.</p>
<p>- Open a manually entered web address in a new tab: cmd-shift-Enter. In a new background tab: cmd-Enter.</p>
<p>- Automatic updates: tell Apple Software Update to run itself regularly.</p>
<p>- <a href="http://pimpmysafari.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pimpmysafari.com/</a></p>
<p>- You never mentioned that Safari is, on average, almost twice as fast as Firefox. (apple.com/safari)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shantanu Raj</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-56413</link>
		<dc:creator>Shantanu Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-56413</guid>
		<description>Safari is way better than Firefox or Thunderbird, infact its the best web browser in the world.
Just try it Dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari is way better than Firefox or Thunderbird, infact its the best web browser in the world.<br />
Just try it Dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55903</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55903</guid>
		<description>"No mention that Safari for Windows is only a beta….and Firefox is a much more evolved browser on the OS. Way to go mr. Bias"

You tell that to users. Safari (2003), as a product is older than Firefox (2004). It's new on Windows. Anyway this review is based on the first Safari beta so you may better just ignore it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No mention that Safari for Windows is only a beta….and Firefox is a much more evolved browser on the OS. Way to go mr. Bias&#8221;</p>
<p>You tell that to users. Safari (2003), as a product is older than Firefox (2004). It&#8217;s new on Windows. Anyway this review is based on the first Safari beta so you may better just ignore it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55901</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55901</guid>
		<description>If Safari on Windows was as good as Safari on OSX it would be a fair fight.

No mention that Safari for Windows is only a beta....and Firefox is a much more evolved browser on the OS. Way to go mr. Bias :D

I would re-do this if Safari becomes like it is on OSX....because on OSX Safari wipes the board with Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Safari on Windows was as good as Safari on OSX it would be a fair fight.</p>
<p>No mention that Safari for Windows is only a beta&#8230;.and Firefox is a much more evolved browser on the OS. Way to go mr. Bias :D</p>
<p>I would re-do this if Safari becomes like it is on OSX&#8230;.because on OSX Safari wipes the board with Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55827</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55827</guid>
		<description>nujad, indeed: "Posted on June 15, 2007
Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week." Beta 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nujad, indeed: &#8220;Posted on June 15, 2007<br />
Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week.&#8221; Beta 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nujad</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55826</link>
		<dc:creator>nujad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55826</guid>
		<description>when did u down load safari cuz some of the things u mentioned are a thing of the past</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when did u down load safari cuz some of the things u mentioned are a thing of the past</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xeev</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55320</link>
		<dc:creator>xeev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-55320</guid>
		<description>There is a status bar in Safari.
And Safari has "Find as you type" - Feature that looks much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a status bar in Safari.<br />
And Safari has &#8220;Find as you type&#8221; - Feature that looks much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-52685</link>
		<dc:creator>Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-52685</guid>
		<description>[...] Comparison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comparison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari &#171; alll about linux</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-52513</link>
		<dc:creator>Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari &#171; alll about linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-52513</guid>
		<description>[...] Comparison [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comparison [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffdsuifhiu</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51875</link>
		<dc:creator>ffdsuifhiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51875</guid>
		<description>umm LiAR!!! YOU CAN TOTALY CUSTOMIZE THE TOOLBAR IN SAFARI, it looks and acts as itunes does, and you CTRL+click to open a new tab  you should definatly do youre research better and not side with one if you are doing a coppairison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm LiAR!!! YOU CAN TOTALY CUSTOMIZE THE TOOLBAR IN SAFARI, it looks and acts as itunes does, and you CTRL+click to open a new tab  you should definatly do youre research better and not side with one if you are doing a coppairison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Smelser</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51681</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Smelser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51681</guid>
		<description>@Mary,

It's a free download at www.apple.com/safari. Doesn't cost a thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mary,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a free download at <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/safari</a>. Doesn&#8217;t cost a thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Lyons</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51673</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51673</guid>
		<description>Can you please let me know what the price(s) are for Safari Internet Browswer for pc's (Windows XP and Vista?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you please let me know what the price(s) are for Safari Internet Browswer for pc&#8217;s (Windows XP and Vista?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foxiewire.com</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51555</link>
		<dc:creator>foxiewire.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51555</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari : Mozilla Links&lt;/strong&gt;

Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week. There is so much to look and try in a web browser that I decided to compile this comparative table highlighting pros and cons of each browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Feature by feature: Firefox vs. Safari : Mozilla Links</strong></p>
<p>Safari for Windows was no doubt the topic of the week. There is so much to look and try in a web browser that I decided to compile this comparative table highlighting pros and cons of each browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Safari&#8217;s Snapback on Firefox, partially : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51553</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Safari&#8217;s Snapback on Firefox, partially : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51553</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent comparison I did between Firefox and Safari for Windows, I missed to mention a extension that adds at least [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent comparison I did between Firefox and Safari for Windows, I missed to mention a extension that adds at least [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51521</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/feature-by-feature-firefox-vs-safari/#comment-51521</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Wanted to point out that the safari toolbar is in fact customizable (I think it is under the edit menu on windows but don’t quote me
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
OK, I'm quoting you anyways. If there's a way to customize the toolbar please let me know. I just checked again and couldn't find a way.


&lt;blockquote&gt;I really like the little orange button in the search bar and address bar that will allow you to jump back to the root of a page or back to your original search results page&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That's SnapBack. The &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1245" rel="nofollow"&gt;SnapBack &lt;/a&gt;extension mimics the manual part of Snapback but no automatic marking for typed urls and searches. I'll update this article and post a review later. It is definitely not scheduled for FF3.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
there is find as you type in Safari. What do you mean there isn’t? &lt;/blockquote&gt;
FAYT is a feature that allows text to be searched just by typing within a web page. You can activate pressing / or ' (to search only links text). You can also avoid the / and ' commands at all by checking Search for text when I start typing in (Tools menu, Options, Advanced page, General tab).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wanted to point out that the safari toolbar is in fact customizable (I think it is under the edit menu on windows but don’t quote me
</p></blockquote>
<p>OK, I&#8217;m quoting you anyways. If there&#8217;s a way to customize the toolbar please let me know. I just checked again and couldn&#8217;t find a way.</p>
<blockquote><p>I really like the little orange button in the search bar and address bar that will allow you to jump back to the root of a page or back to your original search results page</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s SnapBack. The <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1245" rel="nofollow">SnapBack </a>extension mimics the manual part of Snapback but no automatic marking for typed urls and searches. I&#8217;ll update this article and post a review later. It is definitely not scheduled for FF3.</p>
<blockquote><p>
there is find as you type in Safari. What do you mean there isn’t? </p></blockquote>
<p>FAYT is a feature that allows text to be searched just by typing within a web page. You can activate pressing / or &#8216; (to search only links text). You can also avoid the / and &#8216; commands at all by checking Search for text when I start typing in (Tools menu, Options, Advanced page, General tab).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
