<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extension developers prompted to upgrade for Firefox 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Non-Fx2 Compatible Add-ons &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51154</link>
		<dc:creator>Non-Fx2 Compatible Add-ons &#171; Firefox Extension Guru&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/#comment-51154</guid>
		<description>[...] News Source: Mozilla Links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] News Source: Mozilla Links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/comment-page-1/#comment-51153</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/06/extension-developers-prompted-to-upgrade-for-firefox-2/#comment-51153</guid>
		<description>Not likely they didn&#039;t have enough time.  Fx 2 was released in October 2006 and heck support was suppose to end in April of this year but with the delays in getting Fx 1.5.0.12 out, support lasted well into May.

I guess it is a case that the developers just don&#039;t want to bother with 2.0 compatible version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not likely they didn&#8217;t have enough time.  Fx 2 was released in October 2006 and heck support was suppose to end in April of this year but with the delays in getting Fx 1.5.0.12 out, support lasted well into May.</p>
<p>I guess it is a case that the developers just don&#8217;t want to bother with 2.0 compatible version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
