<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2 privacy concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:11:35 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Firefox conspiracy: It&#8217;s FUD time again! : Mozilla Links</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-54261</link>
		<dc:creator>The Firefox conspiracy: It&#8217;s FUD time again! : Mozilla Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/#comment-54261</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;A recent article, raised the question on whether, Firefox 2 new anti-phishing feature may pose a privacy threat.&#8221; - Mozilla Links, October 27, 2006. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;A recent article, raised the question on whether, Firefox 2 new anti-phishing feature may pose a privacy threat.&#8221; &#8211; Mozilla Links, October 27, 2006. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandarojo</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandarojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Mr Turner, it&#039;s not so much that Mozilla doesn&#039;t like you, it&#039;s not what Google may do with data.

It is publishing false crap and standing by it shamelessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Turner, it&#8217;s not so much that Mozilla doesn&#8217;t like you, it&#8217;s not what Google may do with data.</p>
<p>It is publishing false crap and standing by it shamelessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/privacy-concerns/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not so much an issue of believing Google has a hidden agenda - the only legal binding is that Google can use the data for it&#039;s own purposes. There&#039;s no default privacy protection built in to how Google may use the data.

2c.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not so much an issue of believing Google has a hidden agenda &#8211; the only legal binding is that Google can use the data for it&#8217;s own purposes. There&#8217;s no default privacy protection built in to how Google may use the data.</p>
<p>2c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
