<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Quick Find as it should (and used to) be</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:33:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DMH</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-2/#comment-77854</link>
		<dc:creator>DMH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-77854</guid>
		<description>I too am super frustrated that this is happening. I&#039;m not a developer and I&#039;m not going to go in and do some of these developer type fixes on my system. I tried the non developer suggestions and they don&#039;t work. I&#039;m using WinXP on a Lenovo laptop and ready to go back to IE (although I hate to do it). I can&#039;t type 1/2 the time with this stupid issue of the apostrophe and I&#039;m frustrated beyond belief. I know it was mentioned earlier that this is primarily a Mac issue, but it&#039;s not the case with me. Anyone know how to go back to the last version in FireFox? I&#039;d rather do that than use IE, however I can&#039;t take another day of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am super frustrated that this is happening. I&#8217;m not a developer and I&#8217;m not going to go in and do some of these developer type fixes on my system. I tried the non developer suggestions and they don&#8217;t work. I&#8217;m using WinXP on a Lenovo laptop and ready to go back to IE (although I hate to do it). I can&#8217;t type 1/2 the time with this stupid issue of the apostrophe and I&#8217;m frustrated beyond belief. I know it was mentioned earlier that this is primarily a Mac issue, but it&#8217;s not the case with me. Anyone know how to go back to the last version in FireFox? I&#8217;d rather do that than use IE, however I can&#8217;t take another day of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-2/#comment-76767</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-76767</guid>
		<description>The use of the &#039; key to open a &quot;quick find&quot; tab is silly.  In Gmail every time I go to type a possessive I get &quot;quick find&quot; and not an apostrophe.

Please, please, please change this feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of the &#8216; key to open a &#8220;quick find&#8221; tab is silly.  In Gmail every time I go to type a possessive I get &#8220;quick find&#8221; and not an apostrophe.</p>
<p>Please, please, please change this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-2/#comment-76206</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-76206</guid>
		<description>the above &quot;fix&quot; doesnt solve the issue.

myself and seemingly most others do not want an add-on or some option to disable this &quot; feature &quot; ..we just want to know how to delete it, remove it, get rid of it entirely

adding the searchkeys.disable.all and setting to true works in -some- areas.. google search and the firefox address bar, for example, but it does not stay disabled while typing in various forums.. the quick fix of resizing the firefox window is a decent work-around.. but why is there a need for a workaround... of a feature?

as of firefox 3.5.4 this is still a problem.. with no way to remove it

in summation, please don&#039;t tell me to add some string to disable this, please don&#039;t tell me to check/uncheck some search box.. just tell me how to delete it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the above &#8220;fix&#8221; doesnt solve the issue.</p>
<p>myself and seemingly most others do not want an add-on or some option to disable this &#8221; feature &#8221; ..we just want to know how to delete it, remove it, get rid of it entirely</p>
<p>adding the searchkeys.disable.all and setting to true works in -some- areas.. google search and the firefox address bar, for example, but it does not stay disabled while typing in various forums.. the quick fix of resizing the firefox window is a decent work-around.. but why is there a need for a workaround&#8230; of a feature?</p>
<p>as of firefox 3.5.4 this is still a problem.. with no way to remove it</p>
<p>in summation, please don&#8217;t tell me to add some string to disable this, please don&#8217;t tell me to check/uncheck some search box.. just tell me how to delete it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phantom</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-74087</link>
		<dc:creator>Phantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-74087</guid>
		<description>Since a certain update in Firefox, whenever you type a â€˜ or a / in certain text fields, a box will come up at the bottom, called quick find. You can press Esc to exit it, but if you press â€˜ or / again, it will pop up again. I think it has the same function as Ctrl+F, without the next or previous buttons, so there is no need for this feature, especially since it only destroys your ability to use contractions. So after a few months of pain (for me at least), someone came up with a fix to disable this. Hereâ€™s what you do:

1. Type about:config in the address bar, and press enter.

2. Right click â€œPreference Nameâ€ and select New, then Boolean.

3. Type in â€œsearchkeys.disable.allâ€. Press Okay.

4.Select â€œTrueâ€. Now youâ€™re done!

The â€œQuick Findâ€ feature should now be disabled</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since a certain update in Firefox, whenever you type a â€˜ or a / in certain text fields, a box will come up at the bottom, called quick find. You can press Esc to exit it, but if you press â€˜ or / again, it will pop up again. I think it has the same function as Ctrl+F, without the next or previous buttons, so there is no need for this feature, especially since it only destroys your ability to use contractions. So after a few months of pain (for me at least), someone came up with a fix to disable this. Hereâ€™s what you do:</p>
<p>1. Type about:config in the address bar, and press enter.</p>
<p>2. Right click â€œPreference Nameâ€ and select New, then Boolean.</p>
<p>3. Type in â€œsearchkeys.disable.allâ€. Press Okay.</p>
<p>4.Select â€œTrueâ€. Now youâ€™re done!</p>
<p>The â€œQuick Findâ€ feature should now be disabled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich C</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-73264</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-73264</guid>
		<description>I too am now denied apostrophes since a recent &lt;&gt;. No ideas on this in two years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am now denied apostrophes since a recent &lt;&gt;. No ideas on this in two years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniellet</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-72205</link>
		<dc:creator>daniellet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-72205</guid>
		<description>every time i open firefox, 4 pages open - welcome to firefox, mozilla start page, google toolbar, &amp; personas.  it is not saving anything i do - the persona, bookmarks, etc.  tried a couple of fixes but nothing is working &amp; this is so frustrating.  can anyone help?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every time i open firefox, 4 pages open &#8211; welcome to firefox, mozilla start page, google toolbar, &amp; personas.  it is not saving anything i do &#8211; the persona, bookmarks, etc.  tried a couple of fixes but nothing is working &amp; this is so frustrating.  can anyone help?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-70339</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-70339</guid>
		<description>Anon&#039;s solution dated 12/19/2007 worked for me.  (Tools--Options--General--check &quot;Search for text...&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon&#8217;s solution dated 12/19/2007 worked for me.  (Tools&#8211;Options&#8211;General&#8211;check &#8220;Search for text&#8230;&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-67628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-67628</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to add my endorsement of this solution for firefox 3.1 beta 2; once I untangled a minor permissions issue (under linux, the chrome.css file is read-only), adding the lines mentioned above restored my beloved buttons.  Many thanks!

By the way, is it possible that whoever runs this site could put this info up at the top of the page?  I passed over this site three times, thinking it only applied to firefox 2 (How could I have passed over it?  I&#039;m using 3.1, and at that point, my quick find buttons weren&#039;t working correctly!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add my endorsement of this solution for firefox 3.1 beta 2; once I untangled a minor permissions issue (under linux, the chrome.css file is read-only), adding the lines mentioned above restored my beloved buttons.  Many thanks!</p>
<p>By the way, is it possible that whoever runs this site could put this info up at the top of the page?  I passed over this site three times, thinking it only applied to firefox 2 (How could I have passed over it?  I&#8217;m using 3.1, and at that point, my quick find buttons weren&#8217;t working correctly!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abacus</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-66585</link>
		<dc:creator>abacus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-66585</guid>
		<description>Than you Jim.  I hope this works.  I use Google Reader, and they have short cut keys like ga (meaning go to all items(rss).  every time I press &quot;g&quot; the quick find thingy comes up.  I did n&#039;t even know what the hell it was until i did some snooping. very annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Than you Jim.  I hope this works.  I use Google Reader, and they have short cut keys like ga (meaning go to all items(rss).  every time I press &#8220;g&#8221; the quick find thingy comes up.  I did n&#8217;t even know what the hell it was until i did some snooping. very annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-65690</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-65690</guid>
		<description>Thankyouthankyouthankyou! I&#039;ve researched The Google seemingly for hours to find this answer and was becoming convinced it was an FF3 oversight that couldn&#039;t be rectified. Great job and much appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankyouthankyouthankyou! I&#8217;ve researched The Google seemingly for hours to find this answer and was becoming convinced it was an FF3 oversight that couldn&#8217;t be rectified. Great job and much appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-64245</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-64245</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot Johan! Just rephrasing this, hoping to get Google to notice it, because for me it just produced a lot of bad hits.

Firefox 3 quick find can be repaired with
/* Add Next/Previous Buttons to Quick Find Bar */
.findbar-container&gt;* {display: -moz-box !important;}
in the userChrome.css . This repairs quick find in Firefox 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot Johan! Just rephrasing this, hoping to get Google to notice it, because for me it just produced a lot of bad hits.</p>
<p>Firefox 3 quick find can be repaired with<br />
/* Add Next/Previous Buttons to Quick Find Bar */<br />
.findbar-container&gt;* {display: -moz-box !important;}<br />
in the userChrome.css . This repairs quick find in Firefox 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-63800</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-63800</guid>
		<description>Had exactly the same problem as you Hans. Found this in another blog comment. Works in FF3 for me.
&quot;Firefox 3 needs

/* Add Next/Previous Buttons to Quick Find Bar */
.findbar-container&gt;* {display: -moz-box !important;}

instead.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had exactly the same problem as you Hans. Found this in another blog comment. Works in FF3 for me.<br />
&#8220;Firefox 3 needs</p>
<p>/* Add Next/Previous Buttons to Quick Find Bar */<br />
.findbar-container&gt;* {display: -moz-box !important;}</p>
<p>instead.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-63722</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-63722</guid>
		<description>Does not work for me on Firefox 3. I just updated, it worked before and does not now. The userChrome.css is intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not work for me on Firefox 3. I just updated, it worked before and does not now. The userChrome.css is intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-62727</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-62727</guid>
		<description>This works great....the only thing that has annoyed me about ff2 is now out of the way! Just remember to use the folder in documents and settings and NOT in program files (just so you dont make the same mistakes as I did)

I added the line at the very end of the examplefile and renamed it....thats it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works great&#8230;.the only thing that has annoyed me about ff2 is now out of the way! Just remember to use the folder in documents and settings and NOT in program files (just so you dont make the same mistakes as I did)</p>
<p>I added the line at the very end of the examplefile and renamed it&#8230;.thats it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: userchrome.css tweaks &#171; Help 4 Dummies</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-62653</link>
		<dc:creator>userchrome.css tweaks &#171; Help 4 Dummies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-62653</guid>
		<description>[...] quick find always has buttons */ #FindToolbar &gt; * {display: -moz-box; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quick find always has buttons */ #FindToolbar &gt; * {display: -moz-box; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vuorovaikutus &#187; Arkisto &#187; [Ratkaisu] Ala etsiÃ¤ tekstistÃ¤ heti kirjoitettaessa ja Edellinen- ja Seuraava-napit</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-62641</link>
		<dc:creator>Vuorovaikutus &#187; Arkisto &#187; [Ratkaisu] Ala etsiÃ¤ tekstistÃ¤ heti kirjoitettaessa ja Edellinen- ja Seuraava-napit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-62641</guid>
		<description>[...] avaama tyÃ¶kalupalkki on typistetty pelkÃ¤stÃ¤Ã¤n hakusanakentÃ¤ksi. Koska haluan, ettÃ¤ pikahakutoiminnon tyÃ¶kalupalkki sisÃ¤ltÃ¤Ã¤ samat valitsimet kuin normaali hakutoiminto (jonka voi avata esimerkiksi Control + F -pikanÃ¤ppÃ¤imellÃ¤), olen lisÃ¤nnyt selaimen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] avaama tyÃ¶kalupalkki on typistetty pelkÃ¤stÃ¤Ã¤n hakusanakentÃ¤ksi. Koska haluan, ettÃ¤ pikahakutoiminnon tyÃ¶kalupalkki sisÃ¤ltÃ¤Ã¤ samat valitsimet kuin normaali hakutoiminto (jonka voi avata esimerkiksi Control + F -pikanÃ¤ppÃ¤imellÃ¤), olen lisÃ¤nnyt selaimen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-62401</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-62401</guid>
		<description>Works in firefox 3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works in firefox 3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Joseph</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-61272</link>
		<dc:creator>James Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-61272</guid>
		<description>Steve, Why cant you try install the latest updates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Why cant you try install the latest updates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Egolf</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-61149</link>
		<dc:creator>David Egolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-61149</guid>
		<description>Actually, a good first step would be for ff developers to REMOVE this &quot;feature&quot; until it actually works.  ff has not been good with &quot;focus&quot; for several releases.  And no, it is not just Mac users.  I have had the notorious / and &#039; problem on my HP pavilion laptop running XP for years.  NEVER has the Tools/Options/Advanced button turned off the &quot;feature&quot;.

I did find a &quot;secret&quot; command which disables it, but it came back after the next major update and I lost the command.  ARGH!

Given that -F does the job, this running battle strikes me as similar to the religious wars between vi and EMACS users.  (vi is an ancient unix editor with &quot;modes&quot; where clear keystrokes were sometimes commands based on which mode you were in.  Emacs, on the other hand used the ESC, CTRL, and ALT keys to  send commands to the editor.)  I have always been an adherent to Emacs and the idea of a keystroke operating differently based on &quot;focus&quot; is not really all that appealing even if it did work.

I also have problems using copy and paste with firefox and I am suspicious that this is due to the same problem with focus.

My only add-ons are TabMixPlus and Firebug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, a good first step would be for ff developers to REMOVE this &#8220;feature&#8221; until it actually works.  ff has not been good with &#8220;focus&#8221; for several releases.  And no, it is not just Mac users.  I have had the notorious / and &#8216; problem on my HP pavilion laptop running XP for years.  NEVER has the Tools/Options/Advanced button turned off the &#8220;feature&#8221;.</p>
<p>I did find a &#8220;secret&#8221; command which disables it, but it came back after the next major update and I lost the command.  ARGH!</p>
<p>Given that -F does the job, this running battle strikes me as similar to the religious wars between vi and EMACS users.  (vi is an ancient unix editor with &#8220;modes&#8221; where clear keystrokes were sometimes commands based on which mode you were in.  Emacs, on the other hand used the ESC, CTRL, and ALT keys to  send commands to the editor.)  I have always been an adherent to Emacs and the idea of a keystroke operating differently based on &#8220;focus&#8221; is not really all that appealing even if it did work.</p>
<p>I also have problems using copy and paste with firefox and I am suspicious that this is due to the same problem with focus.</p>
<p>My only add-ons are TabMixPlus and Firebug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Kenyon</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57726</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Kenyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57726</guid>
		<description>Firefox just updated itself, OK, next the browser rebooted, OK, then I installed Google toolbar, the box came up for page rank, enable/disable, I make a selection, the &quot;finish&quot; button pops up at the bottom of the box, I select it and the damn thing wont close the box, and it reappears every time i open firefox, There is no way to contact Google, can you HELP?
Thanks, 
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox just updated itself, OK, next the browser rebooted, OK, then I installed Google toolbar, the box came up for page rank, enable/disable, I make a selection, the &#8220;finish&#8221; button pops up at the bottom of the box, I select it and the damn thing wont close the box, and it reappears every time i open firefox, There is no way to contact Google, can you HELP?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majken "Lucy" Connor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57374</link>
		<dc:creator>Majken "Lucy" Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57374</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

I saw the link to this post in feedback on support.mozilla.com, thanks for letting us know this exists, and of course we&#039;re sorry this issue is still occurring.

A few things to start with: there have been several different causes for this issue and *most* of them have been fixed. This has been a very tricky issue to diagnose though, as the devs aren&#039;t hitting it, and no one who does see this issue has yet been able to provide the clue needed to track this down.

It seems that the only reports left of this issue are from Mac users, or at least the majority anyway.  What we need to diagnose this issue are people to get together who are seeing this issue to compare when it&#039;s happening, and what sort of systems it&#039;s happening on. Are you all using the same version of OSX? Do you all have the same extensions, or have some 3rd party software in common?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320465 is a tracking bug for all bugs filed to do with the quickfind bar coming up when it&#039;s unwanted. If you look at the depends on section, any numbers that don&#039;t have a line through them are still open. Note, it looks like a lot, but we make a practice of not resolving bugs fixed if the original reporter doesn&#039;t come back and tell us it works for them. It looks like some of those bugs should be fixed, and some of them are duplicates of each other.

If you want to help, you could try to find a bug that looks like it&#039;s *exactly* what&#039;s happening to you, including your operating system and when it&#039;s happening, and see if you can come up with any new information to add.

Please feel free to use a forum thread at http://support.mozilla.com/forum to coordinate with other users who are having this problem until you can find something in common. In fact that would be the preferable first step.

Next step would be to back up your profile and install a Firefox 3 beta from http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Firefox_3_for_developers . Let us know if the problem still happens to you using those builds.  If not, that will be a clue as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>I saw the link to this post in feedback on support.mozilla.com, thanks for letting us know this exists, and of course we&#8217;re sorry this issue is still occurring.</p>
<p>A few things to start with: there have been several different causes for this issue and *most* of them have been fixed. This has been a very tricky issue to diagnose though, as the devs aren&#8217;t hitting it, and no one who does see this issue has yet been able to provide the clue needed to track this down.</p>
<p>It seems that the only reports left of this issue are from Mac users, or at least the majority anyway.  What we need to diagnose this issue are people to get together who are seeing this issue to compare when it&#8217;s happening, and what sort of systems it&#8217;s happening on. Are you all using the same version of OSX? Do you all have the same extensions, or have some 3rd party software in common?</p>
<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320465" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320465</a> is a tracking bug for all bugs filed to do with the quickfind bar coming up when it&#8217;s unwanted. If you look at the depends on section, any numbers that don&#8217;t have a line through them are still open. Note, it looks like a lot, but we make a practice of not resolving bugs fixed if the original reporter doesn&#8217;t come back and tell us it works for them. It looks like some of those bugs should be fixed, and some of them are duplicates of each other.</p>
<p>If you want to help, you could try to find a bug that looks like it&#8217;s *exactly* what&#8217;s happening to you, including your operating system and when it&#8217;s happening, and see if you can come up with any new information to add.</p>
<p>Please feel free to use a forum thread at <a href="http://support.mozilla.com/forum" rel="nofollow">http://support.mozilla.com/forum</a> to coordinate with other users who are having this problem until you can find something in common. In fact that would be the preferable first step.</p>
<p>Next step would be to back up your profile and install a Firefox 3 beta from <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Firefox_3_for_developers" rel="nofollow">http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Firefox_3_for_developers</a> . Let us know if the problem still happens to you using those builds.  If not, that will be a clue as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kryssindor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57371</link>
		<dc:creator>kryssindor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57371</guid>
		<description>Percy,
Thank you for your comment. I am confused just a bit by your terminology. &quot;Focus&quot; on a text box? Do you mean have the cursor IN the text box? Or, do you mean stare at the text box and use the power of my mind to will the frickin&#039; apostrophe button to work in a sentence rather than bring up Quickfind? Because that&#039;s about what it&#039;s coming to.

:) Ok, ok...My apologies. You are trying to help and I&#039;m being flippant. But to make it perfectly clear, I DO have my cursor in a text field, such as this one (or for instance on MySpace or Google search) and the apostrophe will NOT work 99% of the time. There is that 1% miracle occurance when it does and it&#039;s totally random. And, again, I DO have the &quot;find text&quot; option OFF in my preferences.

So, I will take your advice and contact Mozilla support and perhaps rather than re-explain the problem, I&#039;ll simply direct them to this thread. I don&#039;t think the point could be made any clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Percy,<br />
Thank you for your comment. I am confused just a bit by your terminology. &#8220;Focus&#8221; on a text box? Do you mean have the cursor IN the text box? Or, do you mean stare at the text box and use the power of my mind to will the frickin&#8217; apostrophe button to work in a sentence rather than bring up Quickfind? Because that&#8217;s about what it&#8217;s coming to.</p>
<p>:) Ok, ok&#8230;My apologies. You are trying to help and I&#8217;m being flippant. But to make it perfectly clear, I DO have my cursor in a text field, such as this one (or for instance on MySpace or Google search) and the apostrophe will NOT work 99% of the time. There is that 1% miracle occurance when it does and it&#8217;s totally random. And, again, I DO have the &#8220;find text&#8221; option OFF in my preferences.</p>
<p>So, I will take your advice and contact Mozilla support and perhaps rather than re-explain the problem, I&#8217;ll simply direct them to this thread. I don&#8217;t think the point could be made any clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57251</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57251</guid>
		<description>Sunny and Krissindor, you have to focus on a text box for a slash or apostrophe to appear, otherwise it will prompt QuickFind since there&#039;s no purpose for entering any of these characters while not on a text box or textarea.

If QuickFind appears even when on a text box then you should contact Firefox support (knowledge base, forums and now even live chat). It could be a conflict with an extension: http://support.mozilla.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny and Krissindor, you have to focus on a text box for a slash or apostrophe to appear, otherwise it will prompt QuickFind since there&#8217;s no purpose for entering any of these characters while not on a text box or textarea.</p>
<p>If QuickFind appears even when on a text box then you should contact Firefox support (knowledge base, forums and now even live chat). It could be a conflict with an extension: <a href="http://support.mozilla.com" rel="nofollow">http://support.mozilla.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57250</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57250</guid>
		<description>This is the most outrageously annoying feature I&#039;ve encountered on computers since 1981. HOW THE DEVIL DO I GET RID OF IT FOREVER AND EVER, AMEN??? Every time I want to add a forward slash, the danged thing pops up. I hit escape, it disappears, and the instant I try to enter a forward slash, there it is  again. I truly despise it. HELP! HOW DO I KILL IT?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most outrageously annoying feature I&#8217;ve encountered on computers since 1981. HOW THE DEVIL DO I GET RID OF IT FOREVER AND EVER, AMEN??? Every time I want to add a forward slash, the danged thing pops up. I hit escape, it disappears, and the instant I try to enter a forward slash, there it is  again. I truly despise it. HELP! HOW DO I KILL IT?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kryssindor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/comment-page-1/#comment-57114</link>
		<dc:creator>kryssindor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-quick-search-as-it-should-and-used-to-be/#comment-57114</guid>
		<description>This is laughable. I can&#039;t believe people are still posting about this yet FF does absolutely nothing about it. For the record, I have turned off my quick find option in preferences, but it still will &quot;Find&quot; stuff when I try to type contractions, notoriously when I&#039;m in the google search text box and occasionally in text fields such as this one. Obviously it&#039;s working now, but it sometimes won&#039;t and I&#039;ll have to go back to writing like a podunk.

The other strange thing is that when it occurs when I&#039;m in a google search text field, I&#039;ll try three or four times to type with an apostrophe because all of a sudden it lets do it.

MOZILLA/FF: WAKE THE HELL UP!!! NO ONE LIKES YOUR &quot;FIND&quot; &quot;Quick key&quot; It&#039;s LAME and USELESS! What? You think everyone on the internet is 1) illiterate and doesn&#039;t know what contractions are or 2) so stiffly and properly articulate that they refuse to use them?? NO! We are a world of contractions! You&#039;ve bungled it! AAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!  * runs off screaming, flailing arms *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is laughable. I can&#8217;t believe people are still posting about this yet FF does absolutely nothing about it. For the record, I have turned off my quick find option in preferences, but it still will &#8220;Find&#8221; stuff when I try to type contractions, notoriously when I&#8217;m in the google search text box and occasionally in text fields such as this one. Obviously it&#8217;s working now, but it sometimes won&#8217;t and I&#8217;ll have to go back to writing like a podunk.</p>
<p>The other strange thing is that when it occurs when I&#8217;m in a google search text field, I&#8217;ll try three or four times to type with an apostrophe because all of a sudden it lets do it.</p>
<p>MOZILLA/FF: WAKE THE HELL UP!!! NO ONE LIKES YOUR &#8220;FIND&#8221; &#8220;Quick key&#8221; It&#8217;s LAME and USELESS! What? You think everyone on the internet is 1) illiterate and doesn&#8217;t know what contractions are or 2) so stiffly and properly articulate that they refuse to use them?? NO! We are a world of contractions! You&#8217;ve bungled it! AAAAAGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!  * runs off screaming, flailing arms *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
