<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox not to become fully multiprocess in the near future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electrolysis project on hold &#124; Firefox Extension Guru&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/comment-page-1/#comment-80655</link>
		<dc:creator>Electrolysis project on hold &#124; Firefox Extension Guru&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/?p=5200#comment-80655</guid>
		<description>[...] mozilla links  ShareDelicious    This entry was posted in Blogs, Browsers, Firefox, General Mozilla, Security. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mozilla links  ShareDelicious    This entry was posted in Blogs, Browsers, Firefox, General Mozilla, Security. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 17/11/2011: AMD Catalyst 11.11, Memcached 1.4.10 &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/comment-page-1/#comment-80649</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 17/11/2011: AMD Catalyst 11.11, Memcached 1.4.10 &#124; Techrights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/?p=5200#comment-80649</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox not to become fully multiprocess in the near future Mozilla has announced today that the Electrolysis project, which aims to make Firefox a multiprocess application, will be put in pause for the foreseeable future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox not to become fully multiprocess in the near future Mozilla has announced today that the Electrolysis project, which aims to make Firefox a multiprocess application, will be put in pause for the foreseeable future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ffextensionguru</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/comment-page-1/#comment-80644</link>
		<dc:creator>ffextensionguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/?p=5200#comment-80644</guid>
		<description>Chrome still holds the advantage over Firefox with this. At least we did see Out of Process Plugins (OOPP) back with Fx 3.6.4 in May 2010. Least with OOPP a crashing plugin (Flash/QuickTime) wouldn&#039;t take the whole browser down with it. Unfortunately, one misbehaving website in a tab still CAN take the whole browser down with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrome still holds the advantage over Firefox with this. At least we did see Out of Process Plugins (OOPP) back with Fx 3.6.4 in May 2010. Least with OOPP a crashing plugin (Flash/QuickTime) wouldn&#8217;t take the whole browser down with it. Unfortunately, one misbehaving website in a tab still CAN take the whole browser down with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/comment-page-1/#comment-80640</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/?p=5200#comment-80640</guid>
		<description>Probably because they are too busy trying to catch with Chrome&#039;s version number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably because they are too busy trying to catch with Chrome&#8217;s version number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Ayotte</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2011/11/firefox-will-not-ve/comment-page-1/#comment-80639</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Ayotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/?p=5200#comment-80639</guid>
		<description>Going for the low hanging fruit is the right approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going for the low hanging fruit is the right approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

