<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 4 gets WebM support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2010/06/firefox-4-gets-webm-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/06/firefox-4-gets-webm-support/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpopp</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/06/firefox-4-gets-webm-support/comment-page-1/#comment-78589</link>
		<dc:creator>mpopp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4647#comment-78589</guid>
		<description>Look at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-09 - &quot;Firefox 3.5.11 / Firefox 3.6.6&quot;. Here it says &quot;WebM discussion will likely happen shortly&quot;.

The only interpretation that makes sense to me is that it refers to the discussion whether WebM will be backported to 3.6. And I think there are good reasons in favor of backporting, so I&#039;m optimistic to see it happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-09" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2010-06-09</a> &#8211; &#8220;Firefox 3.5.11 / Firefox 3.6.6&#8243;. Here it says &#8220;WebM discussion will likely happen shortly&#8221;.</p>
<p>The only interpretation that makes sense to me is that it refers to the discussion whether WebM will be backported to 3.6. And I think there are good reasons in favor of backporting, so I&#8217;m optimistic to see it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Saunders</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/06/firefox-4-gets-webm-support/comment-page-1/#comment-78588</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4647#comment-78588</guid>
		<description>Even though I do use nightly and beta versions, I use the current product release for my default/primary browser so I agree with antistress&#039;s &quot;Too bad&quot; comment. 

I thought that Mozilla was going to start pushing through new features in updates.
Besides, it would help to make up for Theora being a flop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I do use nightly and beta versions, I use the current product release for my default/primary browser so I agree with antistress&#8217;s &#8220;Too bad&#8221; comment. </p>
<p>I thought that Mozilla was going to start pushing through new features in updates.<br />
Besides, it would help to make up for Theora being a flop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antistress</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/06/firefox-4-gets-webm-support/comment-page-1/#comment-78583</link>
		<dc:creator>antistress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4647#comment-78583</guid>
		<description>Too bad. I still hope it will be backported to the 3.6 branch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad. I still hope it will be backported to the 3.6 branch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

