<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eWeek: Firefox, a technology that changed the decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Saunders</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77734</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77734</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s cool that Firefox is in there period, and I love the description. And alphabetical or not, and to be technical, Firefox is #9 .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cool that Firefox is in there period, and I love the description. And alphabetical or not, and to be technical, Firefox is #9 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77730</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77730</guid>
		<description>Firefox is listed as 9 and that&#039;s what the post says. Didn&#039;t notice it was alphabetical order  though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox is listed as 9 and that&#8217;s what the post says. Didn&#8217;t notice it was alphabetical order  though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77728</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77728</guid>
		<description>Implying that Firefox is number 9 on the list is a good thing is deceiving. The list is sorted alphabetically, not by &#039;goodness&#039; or &#039;influence&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Implying that Firefox is number 9 on the list is a good thing is deceiving. The list is sorted alphabetically, not by &#8216;goodness&#8217; or &#8216;influence&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77726</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77726</guid>
		<description>Well, Opera has been around *for ever* and never really made any difference in the market. (Although they did spawn a number of good ideas.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Opera has been around *for ever* and never really made any difference in the market. (Although they did spawn a number of good ideas.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taimar</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77725</link>
		<dc:creator>Taimar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 07:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77725</guid>
		<description>No, you shouldn&#039;t add Opera. Opera was always better browser than IE, but it did not change the decade like Firefox did. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you shouldn&#8217;t add Opera. Opera was always better browser than IE, but it did not change the decade like Firefox did. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2010/02/eweek-firefox-a-technology-that-changed-the-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-77724</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4373#comment-77724</guid>
		<description>If you are an Opera user you should read this as: &quot;Firefox and Opera finally gave us real browser choice and innovation&quot;. It&#039;s just that Opera caters to a niche whereas Firefox to the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are an Opera user you should read this as: &#8220;Firefox and Opera finally gave us real browser choice and innovation&#8221;. It&#8217;s just that Opera caters to a niche whereas Firefox to the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

