<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Firefox major update, &#8220;Lorentz&#8221;, could be a minor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-77741</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4119#comment-77741</guid>
		<description>Lake-perfectly said I would love a light fast build - i also only use one computer really so weave is jest going to be more bloat-ware for me to</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake-perfectly said I would love a light fast build &#8211; i also only use one computer really so weave is jest going to be more bloat-ware for me to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lake</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-77221</link>
		<dc:creator>Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4119#comment-77221</guid>
		<description>I can´t like the integration of Mozilla Weave, Personas, etc It´s simply going to bloat Firefox, I´ve already a custom theme why would I want Personas? Also I manage most of Weave features with bookmarklets and I use mostly a single computer so it´s not a big deal for me the syncronization stuff. And in the case it where I may use FoxMarks. So really It´s great to have more options but I would really prefer that Mozilla would keep it optional and not by deafult! I´ve already several extensions so adding two more (specially weave that´s not a light one) it´s not a funny thing.

Maybe we will come to something like using optimized light builds*... or unlikely Mozilla could realese a light version, well this is exactly the main reason Chrome users stand for the switch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can´t like the integration of Mozilla Weave, Personas, etc It´s simply going to bloat Firefox, I´ve already a custom theme why would I want Personas? Also I manage most of Weave features with bookmarklets and I use mostly a single computer so it´s not a big deal for me the syncronization stuff. And in the case it where I may use FoxMarks. So really It´s great to have more options but I would really prefer that Mozilla would keep it optional and not by deafult! I´ve already several extensions so adding two more (specially weave that´s not a light one) it´s not a funny thing.</p>
<p>Maybe we will come to something like using optimized light builds*&#8230; or unlikely Mozilla could realese a light version, well this is exactly the main reason Chrome users stand for the switch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Saunders</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-77206</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 08:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4119#comment-77206</guid>
		<description>3.6 purpose(s).
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_3.6_for_developers

Happy New Year Percy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.6 purpose(s).<br />
<a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_3.6_for_developers" rel="nofollow">https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_3.6_for_developers</a></p>
<p>Happy New Year Percy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-77184</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4119#comment-77184</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t faster startup time supposed to be part of the 3.6.0 roadmap?  Things have got awful confusing lately for the roadmap.  What is now the purpose of the 3.6 update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t faster startup time supposed to be part of the 3.6.0 roadmap?  Things have got awful confusing lately for the roadmap.  What is now the purpose of the 3.6 update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/12/next-firefox-major-update-lorentz-could-be-a-minor/comment-page-1/#comment-77181</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=4119#comment-77181</guid>
		<description>Hmm ... If I wasn&#039;t confused about the upcoming releases before, I sure am now.

3.7 (aka 3.6.2) is planned for Q1 2010. This still sounds extremely optimistic to my ears, even if it is only a major minor update.

Anyway, thx for the update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8230; If I wasn&#8217;t confused about the upcoming releases before, I sure am now.</p>
<p>3.7 (aka 3.6.2) is planned for Q1 2010. This still sounds extremely optimistic to my ears, even if it is only a major minor update.</p>
<p>Anyway, thx for the update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

