<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.6 gets lightweight themes (personas)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet to be named</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-78155</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet to be named</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-78155</guid>
		<description>how to change the background ? i mean the body of the browser ?



???????/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how to change the background ? i mean the body of the browser ?</p>
<p>???????/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian King</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75647</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75647</guid>
		<description>Creating a theme using the traditional mechanism is an enormous task, and shuts a lot of designers out. This is one of the reasons why switching to lightweight themes is &#039;a good thing&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating a theme using the traditional mechanism is an enormous task, and shuts a lot of designers out. This is one of the reasons why switching to lightweight themes is &#8216;a good thing&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75636</guid>
		<description>The only reason for personas move from extension to core is because Chrome has the same (core) functionality as well.  In fact, chrome did it really well...  Its just a few simple lines of code that replaces certain aspect of the browser (like a mini web page).  Im personally AGAINST it because i probably won&#039;t use it... nor do i want that extra code myself.  But its fine by me as maybe it will lead to better UI improvements as them make some of the lightweight themes... more.... non-lightweight.  Seems like a waste of man power when you could just add it in as an extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason for personas move from extension to core is because Chrome has the same (core) functionality as well.  In fact, chrome did it really well&#8230;  Its just a few simple lines of code that replaces certain aspect of the browser (like a mini web page).  Im personally AGAINST it because i probably won&#8217;t use it&#8230; nor do i want that extra code myself.  But its fine by me as maybe it will lead to better UI improvements as them make some of the lightweight themes&#8230; more&#8230;. non-lightweight.  Seems like a waste of man power when you could just add it in as an extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75609</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like personas,because can&#039;t change navigation bar icon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like personas,because can&#8217;t change navigation bar icon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voucher Codes</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75568</link>
		<dc:creator>Voucher Codes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75568</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just installed the beta version Personas extensions and love it! When is the final release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just installed the beta version Personas extensions and love it! When is the final release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mony</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75562</link>
		<dc:creator>Mony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75562</guid>
		<description>I tried personas and I liked it.  When I tried to use it in offline it doesnt work.  Can you tell me why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried personas and I liked it.  When I tried to use it in offline it doesnt work.  Can you tell me why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BjÃ¶rn</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75555</link>
		<dc:creator>BjÃ¶rn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75555</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know, but can guess that the implementation is trivial, the user interface fits well into the existing GUI, and the functionality has proved itself sufficiently popular. So why not? Not that I&#039;m likely to use it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, but can guess that the implementation is trivial, the user interface fits well into the existing GUI, and the functionality has proved itself sufficiently popular. So why not? Not that I&#8217;m likely to use it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75550</guid>
		<description>personas?What is it? I don&#039;t need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personas?What is it? I don&#8217;t need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: level</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75548</link>
		<dc:creator>level</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75548</guid>
		<description>GetPersonas.com now supports Namoroka!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GetPersonas.com now supports Namoroka!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75547</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75547</guid>
		<description>gxg, I&#039;ve said that in the past about a lot of the additions until I&#039;m blue in the face. In the end my Firefox is becoming bloatware and the only thing I can do about it is to switch browsers. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gxg, I&#8217;ve said that in the past about a lot of the additions until I&#8217;m blue in the face. In the end my Firefox is becoming bloatware and the only thing I can do about it is to switch browsers. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nek</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75542</link>
		<dc:creator>nek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 07:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75542</guid>
		<description>one of the reasons?

[Personas]
Bug 226791 -  fix dynamic theme switching feature  
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226791

[Jetpack]
Bug 256509 -  Installing / uninstalling of extension without restarting
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256509</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the reasons?</p>
<p>[Personas]<br />
Bug 226791 &#8211;  fix dynamic theme switching feature<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226791" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=226791</a></p>
<p>[Jetpack]<br />
Bug 256509 &#8211;  Installing / uninstalling of extension without restarting<br />
<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256509" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=256509</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gxg</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/09/firefox-3-6-gets-lightweight-themes-personas/comment-page-1/#comment-75541</link>
		<dc:creator>gxg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3854#comment-75541</guid>
		<description>I still don&#039;t understand why Firefox is integrating this into the main software instead of leaving it as an extension. I see no real benefit from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t understand why Firefox is integrating this into the main software instead of leaving it as an extension. I see no real benefit from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

