<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.6 on November, focus on Personas and responsiveness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EP</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-75610</link>
		<dc:creator>EP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-75610</guid>
		<description>Read the Firefox DeliveryMeetings Sept. 30, 2009 notes at this Mozilla Wiki page:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2009-09-30
newly proposed Firefox 3.6 [Namoroka] beta 1 schedule is mentioned there.  if all goes as planned, the first beta of Namoroka could be due out mid-October.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the Firefox DeliveryMeetings Sept. 30, 2009 notes at this Mozilla Wiki page:<br />
<a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2009-09-30" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/DeliveryMeetings/2009-09-30</a><br />
newly proposed Firefox 3.6 [Namoroka] beta 1 schedule is mentioned there.  if all goes as planned, the first beta of Namoroka could be due out mid-October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EP</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-75505</link>
		<dc:creator>EP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-75505</guid>
		<description>Expect some delays in the Firefox 3.6 release schedule.  FF 3.6b1 was NOT released early September.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect some delays in the Firefox 3.6 release schedule.  FF 3.6b1 was NOT released early September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neovaio</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-74306</link>
		<dc:creator>neovaio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-74306</guid>
		<description>Oh Firefox, where do you wanna go?
Major part of users don&#039;t need Mozilla Labs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Firefox, where do you wanna go?<br />
Major part of users don&#8217;t need Mozilla Labs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gxg</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-74284</link>
		<dc:creator>gxg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-74284</guid>
		<description>I agree, the development cycle should be faster.
A year is a good time between major releases, but minor ones should be smaller and more often. 
And I really don&#039;t get this trend to include extensions in the main browser release.
I don&#039;t want Personas, Ubiquity or Prism making the browser heavy on my hard-drive and RAM usage! They should remain extensions, opt-in not mandatory features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the development cycle should be faster.<br />
A year is a good time between major releases, but minor ones should be smaller and more often.<br />
And I really don&#8217;t get this trend to include extensions in the main browser release.<br />
I don&#8217;t want Personas, Ubiquity or Prism making the browser heavy on my hard-drive and RAM usage! They should remain extensions, opt-in not mandatory features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-74267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-74267</guid>
		<description>I think a year long development time is just too long for a webbrowser. Shorter releases with a narrower focus could also help with promoting Firefox. Each time you release a new version you get press and each time you can say where your focus was so people can see and feel the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a year long development time is just too long for a webbrowser. Shorter releases with a narrower focus could also help with promoting Firefox. Each time you release a new version you get press and each time you can say where your focus was so people can see and feel the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leandro</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2009/08/firefox-3-6-on-november-focus-on-personas-and-responsiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-74236</link>
		<dc:creator>leandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/?p=3744#comment-74236</guid>
		<description>dammit! why personas and not ubiquity? IMO apps must have the look and feel of the OS... 

and support for windows 7 would be very nice incoming... i personally use windows 7 since beta 1 and love it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dammit! why personas and not ubiquity? IMO apps must have the look and feel of the OS&#8230; </p>
<p>and support for windows 7 would be very nice incoming&#8230; i personally use windows 7 since beta 1 and love it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

