Google Chrome versus Firefox
Posted by Percy Cabello on September 3rd, 2008 • Tags: ,
ShareThis

First, let’s meet Google Chrome in the flesh, now that is has been released.

To keep it as short as possible, let’s see what Chrome has that Firefox users may miss.

I would say the greatest advantage of Chrome over Firefox is its ability to handle tabs in independent processes which means a browser or plugin bug, or an incorrectly coded web page can’t take down the whole browser, but just that tab or plugin alone. This architecture also enables the cool task manager which as noted by John Resig, lets once and for all be able to know whether it is the browser or a badly coded web site the responsible for a slow down.

There is a noticeable memory overhead but what’s the point of having 1 GB or 2 GB of RAM if you’re going to care about 200 or 300MB. Slim is always good, but snappy is even better.

Then there is the really slick theme: no main menu, the status bar is overlaid at the bottom when needed, just like the find bar; there is no search bar which is integrated with the location bar, it has a new tab button, it has cool animations when accessing the bookmarks toolbar or moving tabs which definitely helps feel the browser more responsive.

Its private mode, Incognito, sounds like a nice to have rather than a must have feature for me, but with its implementation along with Microsoft’s and Apple’s, its definitely becoming a standard feature just like antiphishing protection.

It scores a 79/100 in the Acid 3 test (ahead of Firefox 3 (75/100) and behind Firefox 3.1 nightlies (85/100). In the Sunspider JavaScript benchmark, it clearly beats Firefox 3.0.1: 3700ms vs 5100ms in my Dell Inspiron 6400 (2GHz Centrino Duo, 2GB RAM).

Another positive thing is what Google didn’t do: they haven’t stuffed it with Google applications integration: there is no Gmail integration (or any other web mail service), Google Reader, Google Docs, Gtalk, etc. Google is of course the default search engine but you can easily change it to any other provider. Of course this is just a beta, and Google integration may be already in the plans, but it’s good to know that there is Chromium, the open source project from where Chrome is derived, so developers will be able to modify it as needed.

What Chrome is missing from Firefox? Well, that’s a much longer list that of course starts with the lack of extensibility in the sense Firefox provides it: a way to make the browser do whatever you can imagine, to the point of making it a completely different application like FireFTP or Pencil do.

As said before, I think Google will try to bundle Google Gadgets and present it as the way of customizing the browser, but of course it would be as limited as developers found when Apple announced the same for the first iPhone.

What else? Hold tight. In no particular order: there is no tab overflow handling, no tagging or smart bookmarks handling, no download resume between sessions, no multiple dictionary support, no toolbar customization beyond hiding the Home button and the bookmarks toolbar, the bookmarks toolbar is only accessible via Ctrl + B, no kind of web feeds support, no native video/audio support, no discontinuous selection option, no page printing options, etc.

The list goes on but since it’s a beta we can expect to see some of these features added, completed or corrected before the final release. Or not. This is Google and the final release may never come so I think if Google doesn’t provide a roadmap soon (ha!), we can treat (and beat) this as Chrome 1.0.

Conclusion

I like Google Chrome, and I believe it will be able to take a significant slice of the browsers market pie, hopefully mostly at the expense of Internet Explorer, but it remains to be seen.

While I don’t find it strong enough to beat with Firefox, it is definitely a yummy option for the hundreds of millions of Google users who will be prompted to install it through a web search results page, or any of the several Google products. Which at this point in time I think is fine. The web only benefits of more and more competition but my concern in the long term is: where do Google stop?

After all Google is a public company, and all its good public benefit intentions are second to those of their shareholders at best.

Features aside (they can always be copied, even extensibility) the main difference between Chrome and Firefox, both being open source projects, is what company stands behind and their mission. Mozilla is a public benefit organization, cares about the Internet and the Internet alone, which as noble, good and idealistic as it sounds, I still have to see any evidence that proves the opposite.

It has struggled in the past for sticking to its mission. Today it enjoys success for the exact same reason, in large part because of a business partner like Google, which is not the same as saying that Mozilla would die  without Google: be sure there is no lack of companies interested in reaching 200 million users, daily.

I’m glad to welcome new products, specially products as good as Chrome.

Comments
Pat said on September 3, 2008, 10:34 am:

> no closed tab recovery

Open any tab, Close it , click on the new tab button , notice
” Recently closed tabs “

gxg said on September 3, 2008, 10:45 am:

As far as I can tell from the screenshots, the download manager will open in a tab by default. I think this is a feature Firefox should definitely have. At the moment there are no extensions (officially) updated for 3.0 that provide this tweak.

Christophe said on September 3, 2008, 11:11 am:

2 things that Firefox should have done years ago :
- f*****g block popups. All popups. Why 5 out of 10 popup are not blocked with the so called “popup blocker” of firefox ??? Is that so difficult to do ?
- the not so awesome bar is a piece of s***t, why does it keep trying to display url like “https://mail.google.com/mail/?auth=DQAAAJMAAADAB4CqzN4uF1K6yjg-yaY5PR24O8BGXst_YfT-1yEuxMdP8XuErp3Rhq1p1jfbd9jb9Uf8XmFYvtrLIbfTa62fFWkUk_LHgPFKXKB61hpCfkJYNkOyL7k71J4B0IwhXNPqXYZDb9OAY3iQFO_cT2k1j3uTYfBlOTsUKMRMx6etC-SF-oh2Z-T6X6yQi6Wwik5x6NH_FEEkBCAqZZfIuz67&gausr=xxxx%40gmail.com&zx=p7re348lphr1″ ??? Am I suppose to know where it goes ?

Also, firefox 3 with basic theme is ugly.

bjzaba said on September 3, 2008, 12:10 pm:

I love what I see in chrome. But I won’t be using it.

I really hope you didn’t write this article in Chrome, because if you did, Google now owns the copyright.

Browser Wars: Part Deux? « Web Product Management said on September 3, 2008, 3:36 pm:

[...] Google. There is no shortage of opinions about the effectiveness of the browser and whether it will hold up over time. But should a new browser really be all that scary? Not if we lived in Utopia, but last I [...]

Google Chrome reviews: browser revolution – Matteo Gallinucci said on September 3, 2008, 6:11 pm:

[...] can read a long but exaustive comics review, watch tutorial videos or read other reviews: Mozilla Links – comparison with Firefox; Mozilla Links – Browser Wars [...]

Devon Young said on September 3, 2008, 6:11 pm:

I really wanted to use Google Chrome, but it won’t let me save bookmarks to my social bookmarking site, where I keep all my bookmarks since I regularly use more than 1 computer. Then, I read on slashdot this morning that Chrome’s EULA says “By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services.” …and no, that doesn’t work for me and I won’t encourage anyone to use it because of that.

Ken Saunders said on September 3, 2008, 8:16 pm:

Great work as always Percy.

Chrome will not be the death of Firefox so people can stop freaking out.
A lot of good can come from this and things will settle down after the initial shock wave subsides.

@ gxg, the following doesn’t display the download manager by default in a tab, it simply opens it in a tab but perhaps you can kick it around a bit to see if you can tweak it to get it to do what you want.
My downloads are cleared automatically so I have no need for such a feature.
chrome://mozapps/content/downloads/downloads.xul

orlando_ombzzz said on September 3, 2008, 10:11 pm:

“no discontinuous selection option, no page printing options, etc.”

sorry for my language but: the “selection printing” in Firefox sucks ( ridden of infamous and very old bugs ). If you wan’t me to send some pages links to prove my point, just tell me.

and regarding selection printing, Firefox team took a “anti-common-sense” approach: instead of provide a contextual menu “print selectio” when the user right-click in the selection, they decide to hide the “print selection” feature in a lost check box in a lost tab in a lost print configuration dialog.

Why to wait Google to do the right UI things or fix fundamental bugs as the print selection problem? don’t you know that we users actually need to *print* web pages and we need some kind of fidelity in the printed page and not a blank one ?

Thanks for hearing

orlando
firefox user since 2004
( and still using it )

Google Chrome: hot or not? | Michael’s Tech Blog said on September 4, 2008, 3:44 am:

[...] more stable and more user friendly then Firefox or Opera. And it seems that their expectations come true: I would say the greatest advantage of Chrome over Firefox is its ability to handle tabs in [...]

Olh said on September 5, 2008, 10:58 am:

Chrome certainly has the potential to grab a nice chunk of the market and I can see it replacing Internet Explorer as a simple, entry-level browser for beginners. But I honestly don’t think power users can switch to Chrome. The options dialog looks like a joke, and the lack of independently-developed extensions means that you’re stuck with whatever features Google developers decide are good for you, which sucks a lot. As long as it’s a product of a corporation and not a community, it will never beat Firefox in terms of quality and innovation.

Tan Yee Hou said on September 6, 2008, 12:40 am:

Found that Chrome doesn’t work well with FB. Doesn’t load the part where it shows how many mutual friends you have with so and so person when approving them

Paul said on September 7, 2008, 4:24 pm:

Chrome’s bookmark management seems pretty limited. Not that Firefox 3′s bookmark management is anything to write home about, regressing from Firefox 2….

Percy Cabello said on September 8, 2008, 12:06 am:

You’re right. I’ve updated the article, thanks!

Justin said on September 8, 2008, 8:08 am:

What is going on with Chrome’s PDF handling? Save only? Is there really no extension for viewing in the window?

Pour some Chrome on Firefox – Mozilla Links said on September 8, 2008, 10:02 pm:

[...] thing I do like about Google’s new browser, unveiled last week, is the refreshing sky bluish theme that I am sure helps feel it more [...]

Pour some Chrome on Firefox – Mozilla Links said on September 8, 2008, 10:02 pm:

[...] thing I do like about Google’s new browser, unveiled last week, is the refreshing sky bluish theme that I am sure helps feel it more [...]

Pour some Chrome on Firefox – Mozilla Links said on September 8, 2008, 10:02 pm:

[...] thing I do like about Google’s new browser, unveiled last week, is the refreshing sky bluish theme that I am sure helps feel it more [...]

Google Chrome tips and tricks collections @ Eurekatips said on September 10, 2008, 5:54 am:

[...] # chrome vs firefox | # Google Chrome vs Firefox [...]

Dirk said on September 16, 2008, 3:34 pm:

I want to try it but I’m scared, has anyone ever tried to get rid of this program? does it try and take over the computer like Adobe or does the uninstall feature actually remove everything. I definitely don’t like the sound of that part in the EULA that Devon mentioned. I imagine Pixxar wouldn’t have agreed to that if the software they used had that in the EULA. I think it’ll be a while before I try it on any computer other than my gaming computer (it’s formatted often anyway).
I do like the Tabs being handled in independent processes. that’s pretty slick if it works the way they hope, Windows (especially Vista) could use something that works that actually prevents loss of our work.
I’ll probably try it this weekend but I would have to pretty impressed to switch from Firefox though.

Gilbert said on September 19, 2008, 5:14 am:

GET YOUR FACTS UPDATED. That part of the EULA hasn’t existed since 4 Sep 08. Google amended it to say
“You retain copyright and any other rights that you already hold in Content that you submit, post or display on or through the Services.”

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/

Dirk said on September 19, 2008, 10:45 am:

Oh, ok, thanks, that helps. I really haven’t had much time to look into these things lately. I’ll give it a try when I get the time. :-)

Sandeep said on September 20, 2008, 7:19 am:

Nice article. I tried Google Chrome, but didn’t like it that much, have uninstalled it. FireFox any day!

Ol’ Bobby said on September 25, 2008, 11:30 am:

It was fun and exciting using Chrome for a little while, and man, is it fast! But it is so lacking in customizable features that it is actually annoying to work with after a while. Call it minimilistic if you want, but right now it just feels kind of dumbed down, like those email only machines you’d buy for your grandma. I can see my kid using this, but for real world power users, I’ll stick to Firefox.

Mjcoolz21 said on September 29, 2008, 11:03 pm:

But, How to integrate with download manager, So I can download faster.

debianusr said on October 2, 2008, 9:16 am:

Oh yeaaaah! Long live to google chrome, best web explorer ever created! :)

Chrome’s end-user license agreement debate said on October 7, 2008, 11:08 am:

[...] and wanted to see what’s the difference between chrome and firefox I came across this article Google Chrome versus Firefox by Percy Cabello. The interesting piece is not in the article itself but in the comments of that [...]

Nitro said on October 11, 2008, 10:49 pm:

No…. Chromes default download manager is really neat. What happens, when you click to download something and tell Chrome which file to put the download in…. A little on-screen(opens at the bottom of the window in the same page as where you clicked to download) slim & sleek box slides up to the bottom of the page and displays your downloads from left to right. But if you want to see a more detailed version of your downloads, you can go to options(tool symbol) and then go to downloads or press ctrl+j and it will bring up a simple downloads tab.

harlemsprince said on October 23, 2008, 12:18 pm:

I just finished pimping my computer with all the google goodies like google chrome and the google desktop and I must say that I am In awe… well mabe thats too deep, But I am very impressed with its overall cohesiveness . my mother always has to look for IE but now she can type whatever she is looking for in the google search bar on my desktop, and find what she needs. I still like firefox b/c you can customize the hell out of it. But we all know how it can sometimes lag, and crash. with google chrome, and google accelerator, I am having a very good experience on the computer.

ADMIN said on October 25, 2008, 2:13 pm:

Google has changed the EULA for Google Chrome a very long time ago and when it gets add-ons in the near future, it will be the best web browser

Rick said on November 1, 2008, 1:39 pm:

Looks like they copied a lot of ideas from Firefox, and then tried to innovate on top of it. Firefox is good enough for me and soon enough it will catch up with the best Google has to offer. I don’t see any compelling reason to switch and contribute to Google’s monopoly.

Lubo said on November 3, 2008, 2:19 pm:

i think that google-chrome is good but it needs more work it has potential.The scrolling for me in google-chrome is slow.
For now mozila is the best.
for now :)

Jared said on November 12, 2008, 9:30 am:

Firstly, the notion that Chrome is an inferior browser because there is less community support right now is ridiculous. The thing was just released!!! Give it time! Check Google Sidebar…. that thing has TONS of third party developed gadgets. Trust me, Chrome will develop a community that may even rival Mozilla’s one day.

Secondly, at this point, the only compelling reason one would have to switch from Firefox to Chrome, is the fact that Chrome is far more secure and is built better “under the hood”. The idea of having each tab utilize it’s own process is amazingly innovative, and their rebuilding of the Java VM is nothing sort of amazing. Chrome is, from a techie standpoint, a far superior browser. It’s more secure, and more efficient. If Chrome is able to catch up to Firefox in terms of customization, which is currently where Firefox shines, it will by far surpass it.

That’s yet to be seen, though if they will do so….

Dana said on November 27, 2008, 11:51 am:

I’m long-time user of Firefox, and when I know about Google Chrome. I happened to prefer it over Firefox.

GOOGLE CHROME FOR THUMBS UP!!

RickDD said on December 9, 2008, 5:02 pm:

I’ll admit I have not read the new EULA but if the language only says I retain current copyright or other rights that I already hold doesn’t that still leave GOOGLE with the copyright to other material that hasn’t been specifically protected by me in some way? Kinda like saying if you haven’t specifically protected an “item” then it’s ours (Google’s).

Rick

Shane R said on December 15, 2008, 10:03 am:

The reason I use FireFox predominantly is because of the AdBlock Plus add-on, because it also blocks ad banners- and that’s particularly what I’m after. None of the other browsers have this feature from what I’ve tried. I’ll use FireFox as long as that’s available.

Jeff said on December 15, 2008, 2:24 pm:

I like the content of this piece, but somebody has to edit or proofread these entries before they go out. Your grammar is lacking. This is especially evident in places where you use the wrong word (like using “specially” when you probably meant to use “especially” or possibly ” ‘specially” to show slang). Yes, I know I am nit-picking, but it is sloppy and detracts from the content (like counting the number of times Pres. Bush says “nucular” (instead of “nuclear”) rather than listening to the content of a speech.

Jeff’s a picky one. said on December 25, 2008, 4:13 am:

Jeff
December 15th, 2008 at 2:24 pm

I like the content of this piece, but somebody has to edit or proofread these entries before they go out. Your grammar is lacking. This is especially evident in places where you use the wrong word (like using “specially” when you probably meant to use “especially” or possibly ” ’specially” to show slang). Yes, I know I am nit-picking, but it is sloppy and detracts from the content (like counting the number of times Pres. Bush says “nucular” (instead of “nuclear”) rather than listening to the content of a speech.

_________________________________________________________
This is one of the reasons why people die so early. (Eustress – When Jeff gets excited for every misspelled word then realizes that it doesn’t change a thing.) He basks himself in the most discrete puzzle he could ever think of and when its complete he wishes to be acknowledge. Well Jeff, you just got acknowledged. Hey, why don’t you trying buying a 10 piece puzzle rather than a 1000 piece puzzle. Make my day.

Jeff’s a picky one. said on December 25, 2008, 4:17 am:

Hey Jeff, I just realized I used the wrong grammar for the word “acknowledge” in the second sentence. What are you going to do about it?

Jay said on December 25, 2008, 9:31 pm:

Okay i like some of Google chrome, like the speed of the search and it simple but For those who watch movie or do video editing on the web I would stick with Firefox.I notice for sites like hulu and other sites that require a applet to run chrome does not want to load. Since Most people watch movies and missed tv show online Google has a long long way to beat firefox. I know google and firefox has a good relationship Maybe they can combine both browsers together:) But in till then I am going to have to go with Firefox

Alix said on December 31, 2008, 6:07 pm:

That just means you still own it if you have a copyright. If you haven’t copyrighted/somehow come to officially own the content you submit to anything in Chrome, Google still owns it. Really glad I did some research, otherwise I probably would have downloaded Chrome in lieu of Firefox.

Akshay S Dinesh said on January 26, 2009, 9:05 am:

Google chrome may be damn fast in 1 or 2 GB rams. BUt i have only a 256 MB ramm and if i try to open a new page with google chrome, the first page gets stuck.

And i can’t even think of running it along with antivirus.

Kyle said on February 19, 2009, 9:27 pm:

you don’t need 1GB of RAM i only use 512MB and i’ve just got to say Firefox is one of the laggiest browsers when used with add-ons and chrome is much faster on my 512MB RAM system you’re probably using IE because you sound like you don’t know much about firefox

Kanaverum said on February 21, 2009, 10:26 pm:

I checked out Google Chrome today, and I’m fairly impressed. Granted, this is coming from a guy who gave up Firefox(2.0) for IE7 once IE7pro (http://ie7pro.com/) came to my attention.

Of course, the only things I liked about ie7pro were features like continuous spell-checking, tab recovery (and particularly the feature for reopening the ‘last closed tab’), and the download manager. Of course, these things were all included in Firefox, but I needed to access specific sites that I couldn’t with Firefox (see note below).

In the end, I think Google Chrome wound up having only the features that I was ever interested in anyway… cool :)

* Note: I gave up Firefox 2.0 because it wasn’t loading a few of the financial sites properly. These sites were necessary for me to function (as they are financial), and if I find that Google Chrome has trouble with them, I’ll dump Chrome also and revert back to IE7. The way I see it, one benefit to using IE is that it always displays the sites I access. Granted, this is probably because so many people use it that they’ll kill Microsoft if it doesn’t work the way it should… but that doesn’t mean it’s a great project.

juel said on February 24, 2009, 2:17 am:

@Jay: I’m sorta confused coz hulu and other video editing sites run perfectly on mine.

Tony said on February 27, 2009, 4:23 am:

I’m just a middle aged old fart home computer user so I am not familiar with a lot of the technical stuff, heck I know nothing about add ons & plug ins & stuff like that. I just give things a try & try to remain unbiased & take it for what it’s worth. If I like it & don’t have probs, fine. If I don’t like it or it gives me problems I remove it. I have been using chrome for about 2 months & like it. The one problem I have is it won’t copy certain things from some websites. One example is trying to copy & paste the url code from Youtube, another I had to go back to IE to do was copying a url for a picture on photobucket to use on my blog. I’ve never tried Firefox but am going to download it & give it a go tonight.

OpenSource said on March 4, 2009, 7:01 am:

Chrome is NOT open source…Therefore I will NOT use it! In fact I will run away as fast as I can! Open source is the way to go there is NO comparison to anything else period!

…and I bet you’re still using MS Windows? LoL!

Akshay S Dinesh said on March 4, 2009, 7:21 am:

I have a 256 MB RAM. And, with anti virus running, I can run only IE or Firefox. Without anti virus everything runs, but, IE is the most stable, Firefox next and Chrome, the least stable.

With FF if I take Gmail or Youtube and open more than 2 tabs the whole memory gets problems and it crashes down. Also, there is this chess website chesscube.com that uses lot of scripts or adobe flash or something. Firefox is fine when just starting but gets stuck over time.

But Chrome doesn’t even allow that everything gets stuck the moment you open a new tab.

So, with very low RAM the most stable browser is IE. But I use Firefox, when I don’t want to view videos or do complex things like commenting here.

C Fred said on April 14, 2009, 9:56 am:

FireFox is killing me. Worked great til last week now it’s crashing many, many times a day. Reports have been sent each time (with request for e-mail reply.) Still happenin & have yet to receive a reply. FUBAR!!

Brandon said on April 24, 2009, 3:08 pm:

I feel chrome is so much faster then firefox. the only downfall that I dislike is the lack of themes, if google had the themes firefox did then it would be better,

kyle said on May 11, 2009, 3:31 am:

certain things (codes, alignment) on myspace and facebook look differently than ie and firefox, but pictures and text seem smoother on chrome.

asdf said on May 22, 2009, 12:10 pm:

I beleive that Google Chrome is better than firefox. Of course, I have a point to say that from my computer. It is a brand new 2 gig 2007 Vista, but I have dial up. I would prefer Google Chrome if you have a slower computer/internet.

sparklius said on August 3, 2009, 7:36 am:

Hihi, if u mean u try google chrome:

Okay, i had been using firefox for a really long time, i love it really. But when google chrome comes out, i thought i should try it. I didnt hav my own laptop at that time n my parents get used to IE, so i had better to choose only one.. finally i chose to install google chrome coz i heard its faster( thats something i want)

i hav been usin google chrome for 3 month approximately, n its fast, especially when u just turn on your computer n just wanna to surf the internet. It doesnt have as many features as firefox, but thats the reason that keeps it simple. One drawback should include the PDF thing(u hav to open Foxit or Adobe to read the PDF after downloadin n saving the document) n the bookmarks arent so convinient. n it doesnt work with youtube sometime(it cant load, u need to press reload, i dont know whether firefox has it or not)
however for the speed, for the simple outlook, personally i think its a good try!

Uchiha madara said on September 10, 2009, 11:20 am:

I have problems on installing a newer version of chrome the exe file wont execute at all and i cant find this path for changing skin for google chrome.

Uchiha madara said on September 10, 2009, 11:25 am:

help me this is my email uchihamadara2@hotmail.com

jason said on September 21, 2009, 2:24 am:

this is happening to me too and thats why i uninstal it i am using the google chrome now but all happened when i downloaded google chrome maybe it is interfearing with each other i don’t know but now i have only GC

Aaron said on September 26, 2009, 10:38 am:

One you can’t knock Firefox three for it’s basic theme, Firefox’s Add-on Page has tons of other themes, if you weren’t so lazy, download a new theme, 2, the pop-up blocker, if it doesn’t work to your satisfaction, download a pop-up blocker from the add-ons. Idiot… and cya

manish said on November 11, 2009, 9:30 am:

Agreed,
Addons are really great features in Mozilla.You can customize the browser as per your wish.

idioteque said on December 8, 2009, 6:48 pm:

we have now themes, extensions ^^
update the article.. no, rewrite it :)
I think Chrome have just kicked the foxes ass biig time

Arch said on January 22, 2010, 2:56 am:

With Firefox you can preview downloading videos with VLC player, not with Chrome. Also, I think the download manager should be in a popup of its own. Maybe I’m just so used to closing all the files quickly without thinking with Firefox because all my download are always on a separate window.

John said on April 10, 2010, 4:06 pm:

Whatever mate your lose! As for copyrights, well open source means (share) as in shareware. The very reason Microsoft has monopolized the PC world and web domination is because they insisted on owning all copy rights. Open source means it doesn’t matter if you are a large web developer or just a personal PC owner wanting to post his own web page, they all get the same advantage. A great advantage, I vote open source everything.

Salina said on April 16, 2010, 5:09 pm:

also if you right click anywhere next to the new tab button, it says ‘reopen closed tab’.

Lance said on June 3, 2010, 10:24 am:

My favorite feature is the full screen which I know Firefox has but Chromes is better but thats not enough to turn me to the dark side.