Comments on: Big plans for SeaMonkey 2

By: wildrain

wildrain — Tue, 26 May 2009 01:47:55 +0000

you need not be a developer to use seamonkey. I am typical accountant in a company with some inclination towards technology. my liking for seamonkey is different, its not because I build webpages (i build spreadsheets with lot of numbers that would not make sense to a lot of people) its because when I use seamonkey I am seen differently. As an application I think it should support a complete web bundle a friend said here…well what you want to load on to it should be left as a choice for the user. Making is slow of fast would be purely on how much you load it.

By: jiMMy

jiMMy — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:40:04 +0000

Please if you want people to use it, keep the original blue theme in mozilla suite. The new look don’t bode well with me. Icons don’t look quite right or cool.

By: Halo 3 Fan

Halo 3 Fan — Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:49:02 +0000

At last!
SeaMonkey 2.0 Alpha has been officially released!

Check http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.0a1/

By: saniismail

saniismail — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:57:52 +0000

i agree to no. 2 and 5, SeaMonkey is not like FireFox (famous browser) but it built to web developer people. i use all from mozilla ( firefox3, seamonkey, sunbird and thunderbird). if seamonkey want to do a change it must be webdevelopment packet.

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:38:02 +0000

SeaMonkey is fast. Let’s not do anything to slow it down!

By: yandy

yandy — Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:53:08 +0000

i agree on the last comment, seamonkey should offer a bundle of communication, messaging, multimedia, calendar, ftp,
office and webdevelopment packet, that can be used out of the box. Right now most of them are
missing. I really hope they come.

By: Kephryn

Kephryn — Wed, 28 May 2008 17:35:45 +0000

I really hope that they do change a lot, I don’t really mind the user interface, any one could get accustom to changes, I think the real point was to create a full featured web bundle.

I wouldn’t mind seeing better use of XUL and its intended purposes, I don’t like seeing multiple XUL runners, Just one is fine.

I also would not mind seeing Firefox extensions integrated straight into SeaMonkey (FireFTP,FireBug,etc) to create the Ultimate Web Bundle.

Keep the nostalgic look and feel as optional, the 21st century we could all use some change.

By: mozilla user

mozilla user — Tue, 06 May 2008 22:10:16 +0000

I really hope they dont change it too much, and especially not towards firefox look
Making it easier to use add-ons is ok, but the whole point of seamonkey is to
retain the look and feel of the original mozilla
Firefox started out being faster, but now feels super sluggish compared to seamonkey
And No, firefox 3 is not faster, even though they plugged the memory-leaks

By: Mathew Hartnell

Mathew Hartnell — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:22:23 +0000

SeaMonkey 2 ?