<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mozilla Add-ons site unveiled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: morganusvitus</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-21028</link>
		<dc:creator>morganusvitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/#comment-21028</guid>
		<description>The site looks great ! Thanks for all your help ( past, present and future !)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The site looks great ! Thanks for all your help ( past, present and future !)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-17804</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/#comment-17804</guid>
		<description>A pity that instead of making rating not suck, they abandoned it alltogether.

Otherwise this is a long-overdue improvement, though they could have learned a thing or two from other extension sites (e.g. erweiterungen.de in German) that still do many things better, more complete, and more user friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pity that instead of making rating not suck, they abandoned it alltogether.</p>
<p>Otherwise this is a long-overdue improvement, though they could have learned a thing or two from other extension sites (e.g. erweiterungen.de in German) that still do many things better, more complete, and more user friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-16893</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/#comment-16893</guid>
		<description>Cameron, hopefully localizers will get to that extra mile soon. I&#039;ll say it is the most important part of Mozilla Add-ons as screenshots are not always that helpful.
It went down, as did this post and now it&#039;s back, as this post. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron, hopefully localizers will get to that extra mile soon. I&#8217;ll say it is the most important part of Mozilla Add-ons as screenshots are not always that helpful.<br />
It went down, as did this post and now it&#8217;s back, as this post. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/comment-page-1/#comment-16023</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/03/new-mozilla-add-ons-site-unveiled/#comment-16023</guid>
		<description>Add-on descriptions and metadata are able to be localised, just the add-on developer has to submit the data themselves and very few have yet chosen to do so. It&#039;s unreasonable to expect localisers to translate metadata (description, changelogs, developer comments etc.) for 4500+ add-ons, so the add-on developer uploads the localised metadata themselves - it is expected that add-on developers will get this localised by the same people who localise their add-on.

Oh and the site has been backed out (again) due to performance issues :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add-on descriptions and metadata are able to be localised, just the add-on developer has to submit the data themselves and very few have yet chosen to do so. It&#8217;s unreasonable to expect localisers to translate metadata (description, changelogs, developer comments etc.) for 4500+ add-ons, so the add-on developer uploads the localised metadata themselves &#8211; it is expected that add-on developers will get this localised by the same people who localise their add-on.</p>
<p>Oh and the site has been backed out (again) due to performance issues :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

