<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uutisblogi - Mozilla.fi</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-51394</link>
		<dc:creator>Uutisblogi - Mozilla.fi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-51394</guid>
		<description>[...] Mozilla.fi:n blogin lyhyessÃ¤ esittelyssÃ¤ tai englanniksi Mozilla Linksin loistavassa, kuvitetussa arvostelussa 2.0:sta. KÃ¤ymme blogissa lÃ¤pi myÃ¶s muutaman tavan virittÃ¤Ã¤ Firefox 2.0 toimimaan vÃ¤hÃ¤n enemmÃ¤n [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla.fi:n blogin lyhyessÃ¤ esittelyssÃ¤ tai englanniksi Mozilla Linksin loistavassa, kuvitetussa arvostelussa 2.0:sta. KÃ¤ymme blogissa lÃ¤pi myÃ¶s muutaman tavan virittÃ¤Ã¤ Firefox 2.0 toimimaan vÃ¤hÃ¤n enemmÃ¤n [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>B.Green you can indirectly change the number of tabs you can see in a window before activating the overflow feature by setting the minimum width a tab can have. Check http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-tab-browsing/  for instructions. Try a value of 50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B.Green you can indirectly change the number of tabs you can see in a window before activating the overflow feature by setting the minimum width a tab can have. Check <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-tab-browsing/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-tab-browsing/</a>  for instructions. Try a value of 50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Green</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 12:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>The new &#039;scrolling tabs&#039; in Firefox 2 slow down my work process considerably because I have lots of windows open and have to scroll to tabs instead of having them all bunched together. Here I can quickly see which tab I need and click directly. Now I have to scroll and scroll and scroll the tabs... disaster! 
I have now uninstalled Firefox 2 and re-installed Firefox 1.5.08. 
Lets hope Mozilla will update Firefox 2 with an option of using the old tab system and the new (less handy) tab process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new &#8216;scrolling tabs&#8217; in Firefox 2 slow down my work process considerably because I have lots of windows open and have to scroll to tabs instead of having them all bunched together. Here I can quickly see which tab I need and click directly. Now I have to scroll and scroll and scroll the tabs&#8230; disaster!<br />
I have now uninstalled Firefox 2 and re-installed Firefox 1.5.08.<br />
Lets hope Mozilla will update Firefox 2 with an option of using the old tab system and the new (less handy) tab process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tenshu&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 is uit!</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Tenshu&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0 is uit!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>[...] Mozillalinks heeft een review schreven, waar je met behulp van plaatjes een overzicht van de nieuwtjes. Download Firefox [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozillalinks heeft een review schreven, waar je met behulp van plaatjes een overzicht van de nieuwtjes. Download Firefox [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutting Free :: Firefox 2.0 Released :: October :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting Free :: Firefox 2.0 Released :: October :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-801</guid>
		<description>[...] MozillaLinks Firefox 2.0 Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MozillaLinks Firefox 2.0 Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-736</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;What should I update to 2.0 for? Only the tab overflow scrolling is one thing I am missing. Maybe there is already an extension which handles that. Btw, I already use Tabbrowser preferences plugin which gives me more control over tabs.&quot;&gt; - Gaurang, October 23rd, 2

You are looking for &quot;Tab Mix Plus&quot;, which offers options for this on FF1.5 [http://tmp.garyr.net/].

Re: the searchbox/engine improvement, I find the &quot;Web Search Pro&quot; extension to already deliver most/all of this. [ http://www.captaincaveman.nl/?id=firefox_extensions&amp;subid=web_search_pro ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="What should I update to 2.0 for? Only the tab overflow scrolling is one thing I am missing. Maybe there is already an extension which handles that. Btw, I already use Tabbrowser preferences plugin which gives me more control over tabs."><p> &#8211; Gaurang, October 23rd, 2</p>
<p>You are looking for &#8220;Tab Mix Plus&#8221;, which offers options for this on FF1.5 [http://tmp.garyr.net/].</p>
<p>Re: the searchbox/engine improvement, I find the &#8220;Web Search Pro&#8221; extension to already deliver most/all of this. [ <a href="http://www.captaincaveman.nl/?id=firefox_extensions&#038;subid=web_search_pro" rel="nofollow">http://www.captaincaveman.nl/?id=firefox_extensions&#038;subid=web_search_pro</a> ]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ikester</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ikester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 04:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I expect it will take several weeks for most extensions to catch up so will wait for a bit.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect it will take several weeks for most extensions to catch up so will wait for a bit.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nessiness</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-2/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>nessiness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>[...] Links: 0. http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/ 1. http://slashdot.org/~Roblimo/ 2. http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2006/10/the_antirelease.html [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Links: 0. <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/</a> 1. <a href="http://slashdot.org/~Roblimo/" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/~Roblimo/</a> 2. <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2006/10/the_antirelease.html" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2006/10/the_antirelease.html</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutting Free :: Firefox 2.0 Released :: November :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutting Free :: Firefox 2.0 Released :: November :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-608</guid>
		<description>[...] MozillaLinks Firefox 2.0 Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MozillaLinks Firefox 2.0 Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>I still prefer the old icon set of Firefox 1.5 - it was much more distinctive.

2.0 seems like a nice, if undramatic update.  It seems to be increasingly hard to find where Firefox is going to put its options, as they change about with each update.

I think 2.0 is not as stable as 1.5 and it seems to use up more RAM.  Stability and compatibility is paramount for any browser and I hope the development team don&#039;t forget this.

It certainly has the compatibility - it&#039;s even better than IE at this stage, IMO.  1.5 was pretty rock solid, too, and I&#039;m hoping it stays that way.  Stability (or lack thereof) is the reason I can&#039;t use Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefer the old icon set of Firefox 1.5 &#8211; it was much more distinctive.</p>
<p>2.0 seems like a nice, if undramatic update.  It seems to be increasingly hard to find where Firefox is going to put its options, as they change about with each update.</p>
<p>I think 2.0 is not as stable as 1.5 and it seems to use up more RAM.  Stability and compatibility is paramount for any browser and I hope the development team don&#8217;t forget this.</p>
<p>It certainly has the compatibility &#8211; it&#8217;s even better than IE at this stage, IMO.  1.5 was pretty rock solid, too, and I&#8217;m hoping it stays that way.  Stability (or lack thereof) is the reason I can&#8217;t use Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hectorason need to rein</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>hectorason need to rein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 09:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Yes it`s true that you can get extensions for many of the new firefox version features. but the thing here is that if for any reason you need to uninstall firefox or format the computer, installing all the extensions again is time consuming (first you`ll have to remember what did you install in the first time). so it`s more easy to have a single version that has all that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it`s true that you can get extensions for many of the new firefox version features. but the thing here is that if for any reason you need to uninstall firefox or format the computer, installing all the extensions again is time consuming (first you`ll have to remember what did you install in the first time). so it`s more easy to have a single version that has all that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Rodriguez Carmona&#8217;s Blog &#187; Firefox 2 Review</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Rodriguez Carmona&#8217;s Blog &#187; Firefox 2 Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-500</guid>
		<description>[...] Mozilla Links Firefox Review [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla Links Firefox Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randomized Harmony &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Randomized Harmony &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox 2.0&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>[...] First, IE7 came out And then&#8230;less than a week later&#8230;..Firefox 2.0 came out. I knew they were coming along soon, but this is ridiculous. At least, thats what I have to say about it. So I haven&#8217;t had too much time to work with Firefox 2.0 yet, but so far I like it. Check it out though. A review(and pretty pictures too) can be found here: Mozilla News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First, IE7 came out And then&#8230;less than a week later&#8230;..Firefox 2.0 came out. I knew they were coming along soon, but this is ridiculous. At least, thats what I have to say about it. So I haven&#8217;t had too much time to work with Firefox 2.0 yet, but so far I like it. Check it out though. A review(and pretty pictures too) can be found here: Mozilla News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My IT Forum Technology Blogs : Firefox 2.0 release provides improved security and functions</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>My IT Forum Technology Blogs : Firefox 2.0 release provides improved security and functions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 1.x users should upgrade for improved security and some new functions.&#160; I use Firefox as a complementary browser to IE 7.&#160; With excellent improvements to Internet&#160;Explorer and Firefox during October, users should move to these new technologies for improved security and functionality.&#160;The links below provide information related to this new release:Firefox 2 Reviewhttp://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/Firefox 2 - Release Noteshttp://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0/releasenotes/Firefox 2 - Home Page and Download sitehttp://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/&#160;   Published Friday, October 27, 2006 11:19 AM by hwaldron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 1.x users should upgrade for improved security and some new functions.&nbsp; I use Firefox as a complementary browser to IE 7.&nbsp; With excellent improvements to Internet&nbsp;Explorer and Firefox during October, users should move to these new technologies for improved security and functionality.&nbsp;The links below provide information related to this new release:Firefox 2 Reviewhttp://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/Firefox 2 &#8211; Release Noteshttp://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0/releasenotes/Firefox 2 &#8211; Home Page and Download sitehttp://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/&nbsp;   Published Friday, October 27, 2006 11:19 AM by hwaldron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Excelent job!!  ...when some on Thunderbird?  ;)

Chaufas

-roger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelent job!!  &#8230;when some on Thunderbird?  ;)</p>
<p>Chaufas</p>
<p>-roger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Percy Cabello</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Percy Cabello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>Lawrence/Slavick, the workaround is here: http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-more-tweaks/

Good samaritans, I&#039;ve already emailed Slavick on this. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence/Slavick, the workaround is here: <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-more-tweaks/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-tweaks-more-tweaks/</a></p>
<p>Good samaritans, I&#8217;ve already emailed Slavick on this. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Sinclair</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Sinclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Firefox 2.0 add next to no benefit. And worse, now that it does not support SSL 2.0, I can no longer use sites I need to use on a daily basis. I don&#039;t see a way to downgrade. So now I have no choice but to stop using the product and go back to using MSIE. Dropping SSL 2.0 support is an arrogant move that ignores reality and disregards to choices and needs of users. It is the sort of thing Apple would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 2.0 add next to no benefit. And worse, now that it does not support SSL 2.0, I can no longer use sites I need to use on a daily basis. I don&#8217;t see a way to downgrade. So now I have no choice but to stop using the product and go back to using MSIE. Dropping SSL 2.0 support is an arrogant move that ignores reality and disregards to choices and needs of users. It is the sort of thing Apple would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slavick Valdman</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Slavick Valdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>&quot;support for SSL version 2 (a weak version of SSL dating back to 1994) has been dropped. If you encounter a web site that fails to load because of this, you should really contact the web master to let him know the problem and update his web server to the better SSL version 3 or TLS 1 (both supported by Firefox). However a workaround exists and Iâ€™ll publish it later as part of a number or tweaks for Firefox 2.&quot;

Would you kindly email me the workaround you mentioned, as I am not likely to convince California Department of Justice to change their ways... ;-) (slavickv [at] yahoo.com)
TIA

Percy Cabello: I&#039;ve obscured your email address to hopefully save you some spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;support for SSL version 2 (a weak version of SSL dating back to 1994) has been dropped. If you encounter a web site that fails to load because of this, you should really contact the web master to let him know the problem and update his web server to the better SSL version 3 or TLS 1 (both supported by Firefox). However a workaround exists and Iâ€™ll publish it later as part of a number or tweaks for Firefox 2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you kindly email me the workaround you mentioned, as I am not likely to convince California Department of Justice to change their ways&#8230; ;-) (slavickv [at] yahoo.com)<br />
TIA</p>
<p>Percy Cabello: I&#8217;ve obscured your email address to hopefully save you some spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Bertsch</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Bertsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>I here everyone saying that this release is so much more stable than 1.5(or whatever decimal they were up to before this release)  

Personally I have been having problems with Firefox2 just freezing up on me and me having to exit Firefox.  Of course I am able to use the restore feature which is nice. 

I relize that this problem is just probably local to me and that for most people it works just fine. 

If anyone has any idea why it freezes on me than please post.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I here everyone saying that this release is so much more stable than 1.5(or whatever decimal they were up to before this release)  </p>
<p>Personally I have been having problems with Firefox2 just freezing up on me and me having to exit Firefox.  Of course I am able to use the restore feature which is nice. </p>
<p>I relize that this problem is just probably local to me and that for most people it works just fine. </p>
<p>If anyone has any idea why it freezes on me than please post.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhivaji Clux</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhivaji Clux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Is there a tool that tells me which of my current themes/extensions will work/not work with firefox 2.0 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a tool that tells me which of my current themes/extensions will work/not work with firefox 2.0 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Here! - FireFox Hacker</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s Here! - FireFox Hacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 2 Launch: Interview With Chris Beard, Mozilla VP Firefox 2 Review - Mozilla Links Firefox 2 Review - Read Write Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 2 Launch: Interview With Chris Beard, Mozilla VP Firefox 2 Review &#8211; Mozilla Links Firefox 2 Review &#8211; Read Write Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 2 vs Internet Explorer 7 &#171; Visible Procrastinations</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 2 vs Internet Explorer 7 &#171; Visible Procrastinations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>[...] [1.] Firefox 2 Review [mozillal inks] [2.] The Anti-release [preed&#8217;s blah-blah-blahg] [3.] Details on our CSS changes for IE7 [IEBlog] [4.] New Quick Reference Sheet Posted to the IE7 Site [IEBlog] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [1.] Firefox 2 Review [mozillal inks] [2.] The Anti-release [preed&#8217;s blah-blah-blahg] [3.] Details on our CSS changes for IE7 [IEBlog] [4.] New Quick Reference Sheet Posted to the IE7 Site [IEBlog] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required Reading: Oct. 24th &#8216;06 &#187; Eruantale.net</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Required Reading: Oct. 24th &#8216;06 &#187; Eruantale.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-457</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 2 Review&#8212;The next generation of Mozilla Firefox has been released today. Read the review and download it now! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 2 Review&#8212;The next generation of Mozilla Firefox has been released today. Read the review and download it now! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue++</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>FF2 Very nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FF2 Very nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-review/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 01:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-review/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>GOOD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

