<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATED: Firefox 2 release coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/</link>
	<description>Your source for Mozilla news, tips, reviews, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:31:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemi4 aka. fERDI:)</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemi4 aka. fERDI:)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>The author, George Ou, claims that he is trying to simulate the experience of a casual user&#039;s first encounter with a fresh FFx2 install.

I suppose said simulated user has no bookmarks within the Links folder of his IE favorites. Some replies at said ZDNet article responds that FFx imports all their IE bookmarks and puts the contents of the Links folder in FFx&#039;s bookmarks toolbar.

An interesting suggestion from one of the article&#039;s reader is that should the bookmarks toolbar be empty, a text that says &quot;drag links to this toolbar&quot; or somesuch. Seems like an interesting idea.

It also seems not hard to imagine that Mr. Ou is intentionally creating controversy and grief in order to gain readership. Dvorak style.

I&#039;m personally waiting for Blake&#039;s review of IE7. Should be much better than Ou&#039;s antagonistic partisan drivel. Its &#039;reviews&#039; like that which highlight the weakness of media silos. Yeah, Blake should give a balanced review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author, George Ou, claims that he is trying to simulate the experience of a casual user&#8217;s first encounter with a fresh FFx2 install.</p>
<p>I suppose said simulated user has no bookmarks within the Links folder of his IE favorites. Some replies at said ZDNet article responds that FFx imports all their IE bookmarks and puts the contents of the Links folder in FFx&#8217;s bookmarks toolbar.</p>
<p>An interesting suggestion from one of the article&#8217;s reader is that should the bookmarks toolbar be empty, a text that says &#8220;drag links to this toolbar&#8221; or somesuch. Seems like an interesting idea.</p>
<p>It also seems not hard to imagine that Mr. Ou is intentionally creating controversy and grief in order to gain readership. Dvorak style.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m personally waiting for Blake&#8217;s review of IE7. Should be much better than Ou&#8217;s antagonistic partisan drivel. Its &#8216;reviews&#8217; like that which highlight the weakness of media silos. Yeah, Blake should give a balanced review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Naylor</title>
		<link>http://mozillalinks.org/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>David Naylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2006/10/firefox-2-release-coverage/#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that tech writer obviously isn&#039;t very savvy at all. But I wonder why the bookmark bar didn&#039;t contain the two standard Firefox bookmarks, if he did a clean install? Maybe he didn&#039;t...

Anyway, I just checked how much space is taken up if you activae the &quot;links&quot; bar and menu bar (side by side) in IE7. Fact is, Firefox is more compact, with menu, bookmarks, navigation bar and tab bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that tech writer obviously isn&#8217;t very savvy at all. But I wonder why the bookmark bar didn&#8217;t contain the two standard Firefox bookmarks, if he did a clean install? Maybe he didn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I just checked how much space is taken up if you activae the &#8220;links&#8221; bar and menu bar (side by side) in IE7. Fact is, Firefox is more compact, with menu, bookmarks, navigation bar and tab bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

